Right Divider
Body part
How could you POSSIBLY "know" if I was deliberately misunderstanding you? The ONLY way that you could possibly KNOW that is if I told you that (unless you're God among us).You deliberately misunderstand me. This discussion is pointless. You have no desire to discuss or engage, only ridicule because you do not want your English-only presupposition to crumble.
Secondly, I do NOT have an ENGLISH-ONLY presupposition. That you would say this shows that you might be deliberately misunderstanding me.
So I guess that you're now agreeing that these languages were NOT chosen for scripture because the were superior, but that they were popular at the time. Thanks for confirming that.The NT was not in Hebrew because it was not in popular use. Quite simple. And no, it is not impossible. I'd rather have what I can access then claim that it's impossible and give up.
What?And my analysis of Greek is not a derogatory statement of English. I said that English is quite a powerful language for expression, but it has not yet been used for it in Biblical translation.
You clearly have no idea how the KJV and other English Bibles were produced.
If you did, you would know that the KJV would not have happened without Erasmus' New Testament. Erasmus is history's premier Greek scholar, and he (and other contemporaries) said that knowledge of Hebrew, Greek, and Latin was required for the exegete. (Not the layman, but scholars and priests.) We would not have the KJV or any other English translation without him scrupulously examining the NT Greek text and the Vulgate, to bring forth a clean codex.
I am fully aware of how they were "produced". There were experts in the original language AND the target language. Then they translated it.
Once again YOUR misunderstanding is showing. I do NOT need the Greek NOW that it has been translated to English. It is your continued claim that the Greek cannot be accurately translated into English.Saying you only need the English is like saying that you like steak, but have no need for cows or butchers.
The snob issue has to do with people like you and PPS that think that you're smarter than the highly educated people that translated the KJV. And I do not consider myself a KJV-Only believer, though I lean more and more that way all the time, especially when I encounter people like you.Could you ever consider that "snobs" and "academics" are not references education and learning as a demonstration of arrogance, but rather as an appeal to the authority of those that have come before them? Theologians, linguists, and the like? Maybe we're not all arrogant jerks, maybe we just want to feed the body.
Well that's just fine with me. But I still have the right to respond here.I am not discussing this further with you. My response is for the benefit of others, not for further conversation.