By your stupid reply, what are you doing?
Reading posts written by people who don't know what
they're talking about! Why?
By your stupid reply, what are you doing?
There could be NO salvation without redemption, redemption being the only foundation upon which it can only stand. That is 101 stuff.
We have redemption through His blood and notice what it's according to!
Ephesians 1:7 In whom we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of his grace;
Get understanding.
When I consider what Paul says the Lord gives me understanding!Get understanding. Discuss your problems and willful ignorance with Grossedout. He is a bird of your feather.
Get lost!
Been there, done that. That is why I recognize you.
Galatians 2:16 Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.
Our belief is required.
Yes it is, but your interpretation of the KJV old English rendering is causing you to subtly insert an idea into the text that isn't there.
What Paul is describing is that, basically it's not what people do, it's what they believe, that is the cause of justification.
Abraham believed God, and it was credited to him for righteousness.
"Faith of" is old English for simply saying "faith in", as it is shown in all the modern translations. "Faith of" is simply to explain that it is faith in gospel of Jesus, not Jesus own personal faith justifying us.
But, in actuality it was the Faith OF Jesus that, by the result of His perseverance shown in His allegiance to God that God could not refuse either His resurrection or salvation by His act because __ He could not deny Himself.
Yes it is, but your interpretation of the KJV old English rendering is causing you to subtly insert an idea into the text that isn't there.
What Paul is describing is that, basically it's not what people do, it's what they believe, that is the cause of justification.
Abraham believed God, and it was credited to him for righteousness.
"Faith of" is old English for simply saying "faith in", as it is shown in all the modern translations. "Faith of" is simply to explain that it is faith in the gospel of Jesus, not Jesus own personal faith justifying us.
"Faith of" is old English for simply saying "faith in", as it is shown in all the modern translations.
If you have ask, you lack any of it because it is a process.
His faith in God caused him to do the works to provide the grace as a gift from God to us.
In this, grace is not the gift but the realization of [pleasing] faith __ salvation being the result. His faith was OF the Mind of God, something different. So now where is the distinction?
So "what is the gospel" becomes the question we find ourselves discussing. I believe it is our faith that takes hold of HIM. I don't believe you won't argue with that. . because by taking hold of Christ we take hold of His FAITH that makes it happen. cf Gal.2:20 using the old english of the KJV. . . OMT: In yellow is what we are given to protect by the new birth.It is not Jesus' faith that is given to us for justification, it is our faith that takes hold of justification by simply believing the gospel.
The righteous were justified by their faith without the blood. So question: what was the blood for?
It's a show of desperation when a religious group depends on Elizabethan English in order to embrace a stupid theory.