Nazaroo... you've essentially trashed Paul as being "cute." You've neutered Matthew beginning the NT with the ancestry of Jesus. Did Ham castrate Noah like your Shelanite pals suggested in the Talmud? You've discounted Luke as though records weren't maintained elsewhere... ask your Shelanite pals if the OT was preserved... that'll get you within about 400 years of Jesus' 77th arrival generation. Pilot KNEW Jesus was authentic, Nazaroo (Mark 15:9, 10, 11, 12, 14, Luke 22, John 18:33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38) ... Pilot HAD access to those records BEFORE the fall of the temple in 70 AD. You've denied the 'name' of Jesus suggesting God only needed a virgin, and any ole virgin will do... and, I presume you're not including the notion a near target download in a moment of passion as some atheists suggest. Jesus was the second Adam, and you claim Jesus had none of Adam’s sin. Was Adam sinful when he was formed? Sounds pretty racist to me… God hates humans, LOL! Well, except for Noah for soooome mysterious reason (Genesis 6:8, 9). So, why didn’t God just form Jesus like He did Adam? Who even needs any ole virgin, anyway? You claim Jesus is the Son of God... well, that's a simple claim:
Mark 5:4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, KJV "Because that he had been often bound with fetters and chains, and the chains had been plucked asunder by him, and the fetters broken in pieces: neither could any man tame him. 5) And always, night and day, he was in the mountains, and in the tombs, crying, and cutting himself with stones. 6) But when he saw Jesus afar off, he ran and worshipped him, 7) And cried with a loud voice, and said, What have I to do with thee, Jesus, thou son of the most high God? I adjure thee by God, that thou torment me not. 8) For he said unto him, Come out of the man, thou unclean spirit. 9) And he asked him, What is thy name? And he answered, saying My name is Legion: for we are many"
Nazaroo... Legion knew Jesus was the Son of God. They knew Jesus before He arrived in the flesh. So... what corroborates in your theology? That man suffered from a fairly rare disorder. He also was a cutter, cutting himself with stones. Mainstream healthcare frequently misunderstands cutters as attempting suicide. This is not the case... cutters mutilate themselves to ease the pain, their internal torment. You might want to re-think your shame-based salvation with a flagrum in one hand, and OT Law in the other, a Shelanite kinda thing. You do realize the Romans traditionally dipped the tips of the flagrum into maggot-festering goats’ blood? I thought it might make you ‘feel’ better, knowing this. There’s a ‘striking’ parallel with Joseph’s coat of many colors being splattered with lamb’s blood, and Jesus’ flesh coat splattered with goat’s blood.
Let me sum up your thesis here:
(1) The 'Synagogue of Satan' (Revelation) are the descendants of Cain (Genesis).
You've indeed summed up John 8:44 KJV, Matthew 23:33 KJV, Matthew 23:34 KJV, Matthew 23:35 KJV ('they' are the “generation,” the flesh descendants of... who killed Abel?), Revelation 2:9, 3:9. You’ve embraced John the Baptist in Luke 3:2, 7, 8, 9. With JTB’s ‘tree’ in mind, your summation embraces also the antediluvian origin of THE Assyrian Pharaoh (Exodus 1:8 KJV) by Ezekiel 31:1, 2, Ezekiel 31:3 KJV, Ezekiel 31:8, 9. You’ve acknowledged Stephen’s insight in Acts 7:51, 52. So, I can’t honestly claim originality, Nazaroo.
Besides, this Biblically corroborated thesis began with the crucifixion instigators’ claim, “We be Abraham’s seed and were never in bondage to any man” (John 8:33 KJV). Jesus, being divinely (Genesis 4:15, 24) and exquisitely sequestered (John 8:15 KJV), inspired His ancestrally arrogant detractors to boast their veiled Shelanite ancestry that remains elusive even today. Maybe that’s a hurdle too high to begin with. Then, Jesus unveiled their ancestry not only to Cain, but the “truth” of Cain’s paternity in John 8:44 KJV John 8:47 KJV that their father Abraham didn’t know when he married Keturah (John 8:40 KJV). Furthermore, their being descendants of Cain was not unknown in Jesus’ day trusting first the authority of Jesus’ Words in the aforementioned verses.
How about there were only two 'Adam knew Eve's' in Genesis 4:1 KJV, Genesis 4:25 KJV, but three sons: Cain, Abel, and Seth. Cain and Abel were fraternal twins since God appointed Abel and Seth according to mother Eve... then, who appointed the seed of Cain? How about taking another glance at Genesis 3:14 KJV, Genesis 3:15 KJV and see if you can dig out that mysteriously missing third seed, since Seth and Abel WERE appointed by God, according to repentant MOTHER Eve in Genesis 4:25 KJV AFTER Cain killed Abel: anonymity. But, Cain’s descendants mysteriously fell off the proverbial radar in Genesis 4:24 KJV? Anonymity. Adam said Eve was the "mother of all living" in Genesis 3:20 KJV... I seemed to miss the part where Adam was the father of all living. Anonymity: Adam wasn’t Cain’s father. Neither their longevities, nor manners of deaths of Cain and his synagogue of Satan were explicitly revealed anywhere: anonymity. After Lamech gathered his two wives (and likely children), who did Lamech kill in Genesis 4:23 KJV, Genesis 4:24 KJV? Was that just some random, drive by shooting in GOD’s WORD? Anonymity: Lamech executed his young, beloved great… grandfather, Cain.
Therefore you deny the Universal Flood in which only 8 persons survived.
Whether the flood was universal or not is just another one of several unrelenting, polarizing, and truth-paralyzing universal tangents. The point is, God achieved His mission, which was to eradicate the mixed descendants of the ‘Adamite’ “sons of God” who procreated with the “daughters of men”: Cain’s ‘daughters’ (except Ham’s wife who survived), and Cain’s Satanic half-sisters, nieces and female cousins discussed momentarily. Only one of Cain’s ‘daughters’ survived veiled as Ham’s wife (Genesis 5:32, 6:1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7) among those seven other souls saved. You might ask yourself what it was that God saw in Noah, more than being a "just man," which Noah WAS when he drew a line in the sand separating the Canaanites/'Hamites' from the Shemites/Gentiles. Was Noah a racist? How about explaining Noah being "perfect in his generations," sons included (Genesis 6:8 KJV)? Was God a racist?
Are we rejecting Jude and 1st Peter too?
You lend the impression you subscribe to the notion fallen angels procreated with human females, but cannot grasp the notion their Commander in Chief hooked-up with Eve in the Garden? When and where do you proffer the angelic influx occurred? Maybe you can fathom the notion Cain had Satanic half-sisters, nieces, and female cousins in the land of Nod where Cain built a city. With this in mind, one can readily imagine Cain’s ‘daughter’ Naamah (Ham’s wife, Genesis 4:22 KJV) had undetermined numbers of Satanic/angelic half-sisters and female cousins (“daughters of men”) who hooked-up with the Sethite “sons of God” inspiring the flood. More momentarily…
I insist you explain who didn't die in the Flood,
and why God would have failed to destroy the wicked
at that time, when that was the whole point of the Flood.
Insist? LOL! You’re a hoot, Nazaroo. Only one of Cain’s descendants among the synagogue of Satan didn’t die in the flood: Ham’s antediluvian, pregnant, nephelic wife. I can readily deduce Ham’s pregnant wife was the sole nephilic survivor to one who subscribes to the notion of God’s ancestral integrity preserved through Jesus. You cannot get passed the notion of racism, or that any ole virgin would do. So, for the benefit of ChreubRam’s audience: Japheth and wife dwelled in the tents with Shem and his wife (Genesis 9:27 KJV). Noah and Shem were ancestors of Jesus of pristine ancestry. Thereby, Noah’s, Shem’s, and Japheth’s wives were ‘clean.’ Ham’s pregnant wife was ‘unclean,’ if that notion offers veiled reflection (Genesis 7:2 KJV).
God’s flood in Noah’s day appears to be the recorded end of wicked flesh. HOWEVER! God made a promise of veiled flesh life and anonymity to Cain (Genesis 4:15). Cain broke parole, celibacy, resulting in his shortened life veiled in anonymity (Genesis 4:23 KJV, Genesis 4:24 KJV). The veil of anonymity was preserved “seventy and sevenfold” generations inclusively, counting from God is generation #1, Adam generation #2, Seth #3… found in Luke 3:38-23. Even so, Jesus’ unveiling of the synagogue of Satan was not the end of flesh. Descendants of Cain, the synagogue of Satan, were extended life and anonymity by Lamech’s deed. Lamech, “sevenfold” generations from Satan (Genesis 3:15, Genesis 4:17, 18), carried out God’s judgment executing his relatively young beloved great… grandfather Cain. As reward, Lamech secured a ticket for a cruise for his pregnant daughter, grandmother of Nimrod, mother of Asshur, and wife of Ham.
Did God not PROMISE Cain flesh life, Nazaroo? Did Genesis 4:15 not GUARANTEE Cain's flesh existence he was so concerned about in Genesis 4:13, 14? Cain's flesh existence was only shortened when Cain, granted anonymity (the mark of Cain), procreated (Genesis 4:17, 18). Cain punched the clock on his generational execution date: "sevenfold" generations... not some 900 years, although I appreciate your assumption.
Lamech was the "sevenfold" generation from Satan (Genesis 4:17, 18), and Lamech's four children (Genesis 4:20, 21, 22) would have been exposed as the synagogue of Satan upon Lamech's death. God's anonymity to Cain only lasted for “sevenfold” generations, and His guaranteed anonymity ended upon Lamech's death. Therefore, Lamech... in order to extend the veil of anonymity to his children upon his death... Lamech had to carry out God’s sentence and execute his young and beloved great...grandfather Cain, veiled in anonymity (Genesis 4:23 KJV). Lamech even named his son tubal-Cain in memoriam to Cain (Genesis 4:22 KJV). For carrying out God's dated "sevenfold" execution upon Cain, Lamech gained a total of "seventy and sevenfold" inclusive generations of anonymity for the synagogue of Satan to remain under God's 'witness protection program.’ God is a PROMISE KEEPER, and He couldn’t go back on His Word and totally eradicate Cain’s descendants. Thereby: God’s flood was not the end of wicked flesh, and Cain’s descendants survived God’s flood via one soul getting Cain’s ticket for a cruise. Cain’s lineage was preserved via Ham’s antediluvian pregnant wife, ‘daughter’ of Cain, who I proffer was Naamah (Genesis 4:22 KJV).
Ham's antediluvian pregnant wife (Naamah, I proffer, Genesis 4:22) was grandmother of Nimrod, the MIGHTY hunter-King of Babel. Ham's wife was the mother of Ham's stepson Asshur, the MIGHTY ‘father’ of the Assyrians (Genesis 10:6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11). Ask Ezekiel about the MIGHTY Assyrian Pharoah in Ezekiel 31:1, 2, Ezekiel 31:3 KJV, Ezekiel 31:8, 9... If Asshur had lived 900 years... could Asshur actually have been THE wicked Pharaoh?
(2) With a mere '13 year' headstart, Cain outbred Seth!
Even though both lived for at least 900 years, and all things being equal,
Cain would have only had about 13 more kids at the most.. (!!...)
In a prior post I already reported neither the longevities, nor manners of deaths of Cain and descendants was explicitly recorded: anonymity. I already reported Cain’s death was veiled in Genesis 4:23 KJV. There is NO record of Cain’s lifespan, Nazaroo… your assumption, although appreciated. Cain didn't take a wife TO Nod, Nazaroo. Cain went to Nod and THEN took a wife. Simple enough? Do you think she may have had sisters? Considering the notion of angelic influx, is it too difficult to fathom Cain already had Satanic half-brothers, sisters, nieces, nephews and cousins waiting for him in Nod? Cain broke parole, sired Enoch, and built a city? How many daughters did Cain sire in his shortened life span? That’s a relatively moot point, respectfully. How many Satanic/angelic half-sisters, nieces and female cousins did Cain have, speaking of angels procreating with human females? I proffer the head-start began even before the time of Cain’s conception, and his wife and harem were waiting for him when he arrived in Nod.
Then, you apparently subscribe to the egocentric notion Adam and Eve were the first humans, another one of those tangential, polarizing and truth-paralyzing topics. That egocentric notion inherently implies Seth either procreated with his sisters, or his mother that even Shem and Japheth (‘father’ of the Gentiles) rebuked (Genesis 9:23 KJV, 1Corinthians 5:1 KJV). Refuting the egocentric notion, consider Leviticus 18:8 KJV, Leviticus 20:11 KJV, Deuteronomy 22:30 KJV, Deuteronomy 27:20 KJV, and particularly Leviticus 20:17 KJV. God’s judgment is the same today, tomorrow, and YESTERDAY. Shem and Japheth (‘father’ of the Gentiles) walked into Noah’s tent covered and backwards long before those Laws (Genesis 9:23 KJV). Even the Gentiles, Japheth’s descendants, had the ‘law’ written in their hearts: 1Corinthians 5:1 KJV, Romans 2:14, 15. So much for your salvific obedience to the Law (Romans 2:16 KJV), although a good thing.
Also, why would God bless Cain[/COLOR] with multitudinous progeny,
when God explicitly blesses GOOD GUYS with multitudinous progeny,
not BAD GUYS. Even animals of GOOD GUYS and CHOSEN LINES
are blessed with extra progeny, and promised to be fathers of
many nations. Not only promises, but fulfillments!
The reason the Pharoah wanted to kill Hebrew babies was
because they were MULTIPLYING FASTER than Egyptians.
Yours is an astute point that God may have blessed Cain to procreate BEFORE he snuffed Abel, Nazaroo. AFTERWORDS, God limited Cain’s lifespan (not descendants’) to “sevenfold” generations (counting from Satan, Genesis 3:15, 4:17, 18) when CAIN chose to procreate his synagogue of Satan among his Satanic/angelic relatives in Nod. That’s what the flood was all about when Adam’s descendants, “the sons of God” hooked up with Cainite ‘daughters’ (Ham’s wife), and all those other Satanic/angelic hotties, “the daughters of men”! Nonetheless, I do appreciate your notion Ishmael was a GOOD GUY! LOL!
Guess why the wicked Pharoah’s people weren’t multiplying as fast as the Hebrew Israelites (Exodus 1:9 KJV)? Consider that the Hebrew Israelites, as did the Gentiles, followed God’s laws of procreation written in their hearts, most notably NO incest, as Seth and Japheth (‘father’ of the Gentiles) demonstrated BEFORE the law (Genesis 9:23 KJV, Leviticus 18:8 KJV, Liviticus 20:11 KJV, Deuteronomy 22:30 KJV, Deuteronomy 27:20 KJV, 1Corinthians 5:1 KJV, Romans 2:14, 15). The wicked Pharaoh and his crew were genetically imploding not following (not aware of) God’s laws of procreation (in their heart’s particularly, Acts 7:51, 52) later found in Leviticus and Deuteronomy. Furthermore, their incestuously conceived misfit progeny were sacrificed (cooked alive) unto Molech, and their flesh eaten in ritual, sacrificial cannibalism (John 6:48, 49, 50, 51, 52, Revelation 2:20 KJV)… what do you think was going on surrounding that golden calf at the foot of Mount Sinai? The golden calf was a human slow-cooker.
(3) The "Sons of God" were not Angels, but Sethites(?),
and the "daughters of men" were non-chosen line Cainites(?).[/COLOR][/B]
Are you serious?
Yep! Wasn’t Adam a “son of God” (Luke 3:38)? Weren’t Judah’s descendants via Tamar “The SONS of Judah…” in 1Chronicles 4:1 KJV? Weren’t Shelah’s descendants, “The SONS of Shelah the son of Judah,” in 1Chronicles 4:21 KJV, 1Chronicles 4:22 KJV? Then where’s the difficulty accepting the Sethites being “the sons of God”? And, since you apparently subscribe to the angelic-human mixing as was Cain a progeny, thereof… please recall Cain built a city (Nod) including his Satanic/angelic half-sisters, nieces and cousins who were those “daughters of men” seducing the Sethite “sons of God.” So, sure…
Genesis 6:1, 2, KJV “And it came to pass, when men (Cain and his Satanic/angelic half-brothers procreating with Cain’s sisters-in-law, etc) began to multiply on the earth, and daughters were born unto them (Cain’s ‘daughter’ Naamah, Cain’s Satanic/angelic half-sisters, nieces and cousins), 2) That the sons of God (Sethites) saw the daughters of men (Cain’s daughter Naamah, and his Satanic/angelic half-sisters, nieces, and cousins) that they were fair (Satanic/angelic hotties), and they took them wives all of which they chose.”
So the Nephilim (GIANTS) were just half-breeds between Seth/Shem
and Cain/Canaan?
Pretty much! I said “Pretty much” because the title “Canaanite” was used redundantly by both Ezra and Moses. Other than in Genesis 10:18 KJV, the title “Canaanite(s)” was a geographic identifier exclusively and anonymously referring to Ham’s descendants via his nephilic wife. Canaan’s descendants were the Sidonians, Hittites, Jebusites, Amorites, Girgasites, Hivites, Arkites, Sinites, Arvadites, Zemarites, and Hamathites (Genesis 10:15, 16, 17, 18). You can find the title “Canaanites” used redundantly in rosters containing the recorded descendants of Canaan numerous times in the OT. Consider Deuteronomy 7:1, 2, Ezra 9:1, 2. Why was the title “Canaanite” used redundantly in those rosters including itemized descendants of Canaan? Anonymity. Therefore, “Canaanites” were veiled descendants of Ham and his nephilic wife.
Can you imagine the metaphorical expression of a giant (Genesis 6:4 KJV) being the ‘renowned’ great builder of a city? Cain was the FIRST in Nod (Genesis 4:17 KJV). Can you imagine a giant being a ‘renowned’ MIGHTY king? Consider the “MIGHTY hunter” Nimrod and his, the FIRST kingdom of Babel (Genesis 10:9, 10). Consider the “GREATNESS” of the wicked Pharaoh, “the new king over Egypt which knew not Joseph” (Exodus 1:8, 9) in Ezekiel 31:1, 2, Ezekiel 31:3 KJV, Ezekiel 31:8, 9. Dude… even Elvis was king, LOL!
No actual angels interbred with humans in the pre-flood genetic experiment?
How do you account for Genesis 3:14, 15, Cain being the progeny, thereof? What do you think was going on in Nod as Cain built a city? That antediluvian genetic experiment included the event in the Garden of Eden, ask Ezekiel 31:1, 2, Ezekiel 31:3 KJV, Ezekiel 31:8, 9.
So like the Sadducees you deny angels and the resurrection...
LOL! You group these two concepts together and toss them my way… I deny neither, Nazaroo. Was Satan an angel? And, I do subscribe to the notion the angels who kept not their first estate. Such happened in Eden, and Nod. Do you deny the first veiled encounter of the third kind in Genesis 3:14, 15? You can’t fathom the angelic influx in the land of Nod producing the “daughters of men” who seduced “the sons of God” precipitating God’s flood? Certainly I believe in His resurrection, Nazaroo. Is God going to send Jesus back via another random virgin?
Just be clear, so people know just what doctrines we must embrace
alongside your racial theories, because we need to know
exactly what you're selling.
It’s ancestral integrity, Nazaroo. You’re the one who says Ezra was a racist… not me, LOL! Why didn’t God execute Cain in the first place? Was God a racist banishing Cain? Was God a racist bringing forth His flood? Was Noah a racist drawing a line in the sand?
Whats popular with the Jesuit Cabal this week?
That’s your skill set, Nazaroo. I am curious about Jesuits, though.
Maybe we should consult some of your handbooks,
like the (Masonic forgery) 6th and 7th Books of Moses,
which indeed look like they were drawn by people of your IQ...
They used to sell those in the back of comic books:
is that where you got your copy?
ROFLOL! I am totally out of your league, Nazaroo. I’ve never heard of such books. However, if my IQ is the only thing short about me… well, are your shoes dry? Sorry you can’t find any Youtube account of my thesis. It’s quite original. I’ve surfed around and can’t find a consensus on the mark of Cain. So, I figure my notion is as good as the next. If you weren’t so affectionately flogging yourself, you might be able to think outside the Law, LOL! I can’t find anyone who has figured out the significance of “sevenfold” or “seventy and sevenfold.” I had subsequently found a distant Jewish account that Lamech might have killed Cain, and that Cain was the son of Wrath. I haven’t surfed around to know if anyone has unraveled the utterly OBVIOUS ancestral UNambiguity in, “We be Abraham’s seed and were never in bondage to any man.” Israelites? Care to offer your rendering? I’m just a neologian flying by the seat of my knickers… which, unlike yours flogging yourself reading comic books, mine are on, LOL! You entirely crack me up, Nazaroo. Thanks for your post.
kayaker
