I AM means more than to simply exist, it means self existent, that is to be existent by one's own power. It can only apply to God.
I don't think Meshak is an enemy of the Gospel. I think most of the other people here are.
KingdomRose, were you raised as a JW from childhood, or did you go from, say, the mainline Christianity that is out there, to JW?
If the latter, what did you believe about how salvation is attained before you became a JW?
Thanks, in advance.
KR is a full fledged Jehovah Witness. He/she isn't a "True Believer" but a member of a cult.
I was baptized as a baby in the Methodist Church. I attended that church until my parents started going to the Baptist Church when I was a teenager. I was then baptized into that church. When the choir director ran away with a married woman, my parents left, as I did, to go to a fundamentalist, non-denominational church. When that church refused a black family to come in to the church I became disillusioned with that church, and we all went to a little hole-in-the-wall fundamentalist church, teaching the same things as the Baptists and the other fundamentalist, non-denominational, "born-again" churches. Sick of the hypocrisy I saw in all those churches, I left any religion and got into the occult, but quickly left that when I started to study with Jehovah's Witnesses.
Before I came into contact with JWs, I believed that I had to believe in Jesus Christ as my Redeemer. After I came into contact with them I continued (and continue) to believe the same thing.
Jesus did no such thing.
God the Father came in the flesh as a Son.
God did not pretend to come as a man, he really came as a man.
Who is lucifer in your religious beliefs?
Well, to be honest, I don't take the word of cultists. I just don't see the validity in it. Know what I mean? Perhaps not?
A born-again person ALSO has to "endure to the end." Jesus was speaking directly to those "born again," back in his day. He wasn't talking just to hear himself talk. What he said about enduring applies to those born again AND those who are not.
We don't call Satan "Lucifer," because that name doesn't clearly refer to the actual fallen angel that we call Satan the Devil. But Satan's story lines up with that spoken of in the Bible that refers to the king of Babylon and the king of Tyre. (Isaiah 14:12-14; Ezekiel 28:13-17) So we view Satan's story like these portions of Scripture. But we refer to him as "Satan," or the "Devil."
Your point?
Neither do you take the word of the Scriptures, though you know from whence they are being quoted (the Bible itself). Because they contradict your beliefs, you ignore them.
Well, to be honest, I don't take the word of cultists. I just don't see the validity in it. Know what I mean? Perhaps not?
Satan means accuser of the brethren
YOU and shackles are his servant
IMHO, in the NT we find the teachings of Paul and not those of Jesus. The teachings of Jesus are found in the Tanach. We are forgetting that Jesus was a Jew and not a Christian. The Jewish gospel is to be found in the Tanach.
I AM means more than to simply exist, it means self existent, that is to be existent by one's own power. It can only apply to God.
shackles is not searching, she is come to accuse us as YOU do of being enemies of God. She is the great apostle meshackles, she admits she is not saved but she can lead others to salvation
Never once do you say you found Christ...THAT is your problem....you will still be bound by the occult if the Holy Ghost has not delivered you....it will keep you from understanding the gospel
Ephesians 2:8-10 New American Standard Bible (NASB)No one IS saved at this point, unless they were to die today. Then they would be saved, because they stayed on the road leading to life, and they endured to the end of their life. If I died today, I know I would wake up in Paradise, thus being "saved." But I have to keep on obeying Jesus to the end, if I want to be saved. Why do you ignore what Jesus said at Matthew 24:13?