The question that you were asking or what you were speaking to. These scriptures do not say that Jesus is YHVH.
Sure do! Scripture says that the Word was God. You do not have to believe it but God said it.
The question that you were asking or what you were speaking to. These scriptures do not say that Jesus is YHVH.
YHVH is not mentioned.Sure do! Scripture says that the Word was God. You do not have to believe it but God said it.
Scripture says that the Word was God. You do not have to believe it but God said it.
Many Bibles say that the Word is God. The NT Greek manuscripts and texts say that the Word is a god. http://examiningthetrinity.blogspot.com/2009/09/john-11c-primer_21.html
Many Bibles say that the Word is God. The NT Greek manuscripts and texts say that the Word is a god. http://examiningthetrinity.blogspot.com/2009/09/john-11c-primer_21.html
That is baloney, the site you found is all baloney! "The word is with God" and Jesus is 'the Word;, which does not mean He is some other strange god, you pagan. Jesus is God.
Sure do! Scripture says that the Word was God. You do not have to believe it but God said it.
That is baloney, the site you found is all baloney! "The word is with God" and Jesus is 'the Word;, which does not mean He is some other strange god, you pagan. Jesus is God.
"The site you found" is my own blog of my own personal studies. If anyone were to actually study it, they would know that it is true (but probably would not admit it).
"The site you found" is my own blog of my own personal studies. If anyone were to actually study it, they would know that it is true (but probably would not admit it).
That "a god" you preach is the Creator. There is no other God out there.
Bright Raven wrote
Many Bibles say that the Word is God at John 1:1c. The NT Greek manuscripts and texts, however, say that the Word is a god. http://examiningthetrinity.blogspot.com/2009/09/john-11c-primer_21.html
That is JW theology.
I don't care if it's anybody's theology.
I just know that I spent years studying that one scripture and John's grammar and usage everywhere else. I can prove that my own private study of John 1:1c proves that it should read "And the Word was a god." And if anyone here insists I am wrong without actually carefully studying my work, that is their loss and a violation of the actual truth-seeking process.
Looking at the Greek, it says "and God was the Word" or possibly "and divine was the Word".I can prove that my own private study of John 1:1c proves that it should read "And the Word was a god."
That’s fine, I was only saying that you had a different perspective to the view that I hold.I didn't say that the majority is always right. I was responding to you comment that my view is "a different perspective." Since it's the majority view, it's more accurate that other views are the "different" ones, if we're comparing one to another.
Acts 20:17 (KJV): And from Miletus he sent to Ephesus, and called the elders of the church.How are you justifying this latter statement? I can't see any positive statement in Scripture saying this. It seems you draw your conclusion based on something else.
I belong to a lay community and do not endorse the Catholic teachings and practise. The Catholic Church has been receiving bad publicity in Australia recently.There are thousands of validly ordained bishops today, Catholic and Orthodox, and some of them are "diocesan" in that they preside over a diocese, but the norm is for each diocesan bishop to have a number of auxiliary bishops who assist him, and the priesthood, which are ordained assistants also to the diocesan bishops, is a very old office as well.
If I grant that your reading there is correct, then I also have you extending out the prospect of this warning to necessarily mean that the entire office of Bishop has been as I said corrupt, ruined, and wasted. So in effect, you believe in the 'cessation of bishops,' and do not submit to your bishop as a result; and I do not believe that you have valid justification for such a view.
iow your view is that all bishops have forsaken the true way, and so none of them teach the authentic Christian faith. I don't find support for this view.
I don't care if it's anybody's theology. I just know that I spent years studying that one scripture and John's grammar and usage everywhere else. I can prove that my own private study of John 1:1c proves that it should read "And the Word was a god." And if anyone here insists I am wrong without actually carefully studying my work, that is their loss and a violation of the actual truth-seeking process.
http://examiningthetrinity.blogspot.com/2013/02/seven-lessons-for-john-11c-a.html
http://examiningthetrinity.blogspot.com/2009/09/john-11c-primer_21.html
http://examiningthetrinity.blogspot.com/2009/09/definite-john-11c.html
Sorry, that verse doesn't say Jesus IS God, it says Jesus is FULL of God.The reason that I say no to what you are saying is because I have read Colossians 2:9 NASB.
The "logos" stated in John is ALWAYS something spoken, or written.That "a god" you preach is the Creator. There is no other God out there.
It says that all of the fullness of Deity dwells in Him in bodily form.Sorry, that verse doesn't say Jesus IS God, it says Jesus is FULL of God.
I try to be, he succeeded.