noguru
Well-known member
I never said the study you referenced wasn't valid. I said you need to add abortion homicides per the scientific and lexical definition.
Then do it! You started this whole discourse by claiming you already had these figures.
I never said the study you referenced wasn't valid. I said you need to add abortion homicides per the scientific and lexical definition.
Apples to oranges. The historical rates are criminal homicides. I see your point about abortion, but the declining abortion rates say that we're getting better, rather than worse.
How does that compare to European nations like France, if you include abortions?
The percentage of pregnancies that end in an abortion is lower in the United States than it is in various other countries:
1995 for all but the US, which was for 1996
- Sweden 68.8
 - France 50.5
 - Canada 46.4
 - Great Britain 39.4
 - United States 34.9
 
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/health/daily/051606/teensex.html
Science says that because a fetus is exactly that. The beginning of a human life within, and biologically (not just physically) dependent on, another human being.
You still have not offered any statistical support for your claim. Nor have you provided a list of these countries you believe fulfill the requirements you have set down.
We discussed Chile, which you originally proposed. The homicide rate is 4 compared to the US rate of 38. this is at least the third time I have posted it for you.
Right, and when I asked you if you were holding up Chile as an example of a nation with less violence that should be held as a model for other countries you seemed to reject that idea. Now I could be mistaken, so now is the time for you to clarify.
Chile's homicide rate is 95 times less than the US. Do we really need to say more???
A simple "yes" would do. You could have admitted your intention when I first asked and we might have avoided the ensuing confusion.
Using recent figures the calcs are as follows:
(US population/homicides) x 100,000
(314,000,000/(12,800 + 1,200,000)) = 380 homicides per 100k
This has little to do with the intentional homicide rate.
Notice, compared to four European nations, the U.S. has the lowest abortion rate per 100 pregnancies. And it continues to decline. I think that's a good thing, don't you?
Way to show that anti American ax you have grinding ther. He said having a lower and decreasing rate of abortion was a good thing. It's sad when a bias interferes with rational process.The RCC considers abortion a homicide and it most certainly is intentional.
As long as abortion is allowed by law it will never be a "good thing".
Way to show that anti American ax you have grinding ther. He said having a lower and decreasing rate of abortion was a good thing. It's sad when a bias interferes with rational process.
Make up your mind.Yay, you lynched a couple fewer black people last year.lain:
Make up your mind.
You want me to draw some distinction between hanging a man and dismembering a child?
A rational person would agree that a declining homicide rate and a declining abortion rate are good things.
Which, I suppose, is why you don't agree.