Epoisses
New member
That doesn't matter who I know. I know you are a unbeliever.
Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk
I know that the Falcons suck because they have fans like you!
That doesn't matter who I know. I know you are a unbeliever.
Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk
That is talking about you adding additional requirements to salvation
That is talking about you adding additional requirements to salvation and you're under God's condemnation for twisting the gospel using semi pelagianism and you ought to be ashamed for misleading others
Faith is not a work- being a Calvinist requires that one believe it is about the only thing that is, by definition, not a work.
Faith is something, through no doing of your own, imputed to you as part of the elect- as I've stated, it is not because you believe in Christ because you are saved, but rather you are saved because you believe in Christ.
Just as Abraham, so are you- his soul was sought after by God, and not the other way around.
Faith is not a work- being a Calvinist requires that one believe it is about the only thing that is, by definition, not a work.
Faith is something, through no doing of your own, imputed to you as part of the elect- as I've stated, it is not because you believe in Christ that you are saved, but rather you are saved and with that you believe in Christ.
Faith is an attribute to your election.
Just as Abraham, so are you- his soul was sought after by God, and not the other way around. Abraham would have believed in Egypt's sun god, Ra, if Yahweh had not approached him.
But believe what you want to believe, I've pretty much given up on you Arminian based believers
You love fake free will and God willed them to believe. It was answered. If left God out and you weren't willed to believe that based on your semi pelagianism flavors. You leave a bad taste in your theology.A different Gospel might include additional requirements, yes.
Sorry - where does your assertion come from - that I'm under condemnation re semi-Pelagianism?
You didn't answer the question:
The Gospel that is preached to them now as believers - is it to be the same as the Gospel that they accepted?
So do Calvinists. See, you don't know Calvinism. Piper says he is a 7 point Calvinist. Five points are not enough for Piper so he adds two more:John Piper preaches 'Christ died for your sins' to unbelievers. In so doing, he affirms that Jesus died for all men.
Your "may" isn't the biblical "may". You leave bitter arminian flavors that sours quickly.So as long as such additions as Paul does indeed rebuke the Galatians for are excluded from the Gospel, we may change it at our pleasure? We may change 'Christ dying for your sins' to 'Christ dying for some'? We wont then incur Paul's curse for such alterations? Really?
http://theologyonline.com/showthread.php?117605-A-challenge-to-Calvinism-on-limited-atonement
It was by faith, not law keeping. You work to earn salvation through legalism. You don't let God do the choosing so you can boast about your free will superpowers. Abraham had nothing to boast about. You're not supergirlRomans 4:1-4.
Faith is not a work of righteousness.
Only faith can see the future as it receives the promises of God.Faith is morally neutral - so it is not a work - Hebrews 11.
Faith is morally neutral - so it is not a work - Hebrews 11.
It was by faith, not law keeping. You work to earn salvation through legalism. You don't let God do the choosing so you can boast about your free will superpowers. Abraham had nothing to boast about. You're not supergirl
You love fake free will and God willed them to believe. It was answered. If left God out and you weren't willed to believe that based on your semi pelagianism flavors. You leave a bad taste in your theology.
So do Calvinists. See, you don't know Calvinism. Piper says he is a 7 point Calvinist. Five points are not enough for Piper so he adds two more:
"The "sixth" point, double predestination, is simply the flip side of unconditional election. Just as God chooses whom He will save without regard to any distinctives in the person (Ephesians 1:5-6;*Acts 13:48;*Revelation 17:8), so also*he decides whom He will not save*without regard to any distinctives in the individual (John 10:26;*12:37-40;*Romans 9:11-18;1 Peter 2:7-8)."*
"The "seventh" point, the best-of-all-possible worlds, means that God governs the course of history so that, in the long run, His glory will be more fully displayed and His people more fully satisfied than would have been the case in any other world. If we look only at the way things are now in the present era of this fallen world, this is not the best-of-all-possible worlds. But if we look at the whole course of history, from creation to redemption to eternity and beyond, and see the entirety of God's plan, it is the best-of-all-possible plans and leads to the best-of-all-possible eternities. And therefore this universe (and the events that happen in it from creation into eternity, taken as a whole) is the best-of-all-possible-worlds."
It was by faith, not law keeping. You work to earn salvation through legalism. You don't let God do the choosing so you can boast about your free will superpowers. Abraham had nothing to boast about. You're not supergirl
So you agree
I'm not going to go the cheap route and try patronizing you- I'll say instead, that we were all predestined and one should be eternally happy because of it- did God NOT choose you?
It's a powerful thing, you see.
Only the "all" is convicted. Everyone of that kind of "all" will be saved.
The unbelievers believed due to God making them willing. The plan was for his children to believe cause He said so even before they were born. You're really pushing God around like scrambles eggs so you can have your vown theology to suit your freedomPreaching 'Christ died for our sins' to unbelievers affirms that Christ died for all men.
Nothing there that proves that.
There's no glory if men are unable synergistically to turn to God.