Are you asking why anyone born today has indwelling sin, if Jesus dies for all sin?
Still not sure I understand your question.
All men are dead (even those born today) because of the sin of Adam. The death of Jesus for our sins, does not remove sin from the flesh. It simply gives opportunity for all men to receive His life and be separated (circumcised) from the flesh. Before we receive His life we are still separated from God (dead) and in the flesh. When we receive His life, we are now one spirit with Him and no longer in the flesh. If Jesus had not resolved the sin issue we would have no access to God. The Way to God is through Jesus, and only through Jesus. By believing the Gospel we are accepting His sacrifice for our sins.
Ask me more questions if I'm not covering the one you asked.
It is 100% efficacious for those who hear and believe the gospel. That's why men preach it. :duh:The death of Jesus Christ on the cross purchased once and for all, everlasting life for His people. He became their spiritual Surety and Guarantee of everlasting life.
You are reducing the efficacy of Christ's work of redemption, to be just a "possibility" or "opportunity" for sinners to be saved, which is still contingent upon their actions (works, versus His divine works of grace).
Reformers teach the righteous works of Jesus Christ were sinless, perfect, and complete . . . 100% efficacious to save His people from their sins.
It is 100% efficacious for those who hear and believe the gospel.
Why are you ashamed of God's Word? Do you hate it whenever I teach using scripture?
Is scripture alone not worthy of your consideration?
Abraham believed God, after God told him about the promise.That is conditional grace, which I believe is false teaching.
How can Godly grace be saving grace, if it is contingent upon human actions or works?
We're not, it's just that you're an idiot.Why are you ashamed of God's Word?
You are not teaching abything, you are just doing word searches and then cutting and pasting the results. You are waste of time and a troll.Do you hate it whenever I teach using scripture?
It is when it is used in context and in relation to a conversation.Is scripture alone not worthy of your consideration?
Go straight to hell, and take your pig with you.You want my word and reject God's word?
Not me! I love all presentation of Scripture, that comes without private interpretation and personal commentary!
Sola Scriptura!
why was I dead in sin if sin was dealt with at the cross almost 2000 years ago, especially if Jesus died for my personal sins in any sense? How do you explain that?
Matthew 20:28 "even as the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many.”
to give his life as a ransom for many.
All the elect is many.
You fail to rightly divide the word of truth. At some point the man Christ Jesus gave Himself a ransom for all to be testified in due time! Paul was that due time testifier!Why are you ashamed of God's Word? I teach using scripture.
Is scripture alone not worthy of your consideration? You reject God's word?
I bolded all the important parts that you need to pay attention to. It prove that ALL doesn't mean everyone ever living, but the elect.
You want some exegesis?
Matthew 20:28 "even as the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many.”
to give his life as a ransom for many.
All the elect is many.
You're "being saved"? That's too bad. Those who have trusted the Lord believing the gospel of Christ are saved (1 Corinthians 15:1-4 KJV).LoL, for you yes. However, I forgot it doesn't have meaning to those who are perishing. Whoops.
1 Corinthians 1:18 For the word of the cross is folly to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God.
This is what it says.1 Corinthians 1:18 For the word of the cross is folly to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God.
Letter writer included himself using the us. Who are the us? All the elect, who are being saved. The us include saints who are already saved and saints who will be saved.
This is how I have thought of this passage as well.
This is how I have thought of this passage as well.
In the context it seems that Paul is appealing to and exhorting the brethren to be assured of their calling in Christ, and not be caught up in divisions and quarrels.
The following passages may it clear that we are to follow Christ, alone and not divide our allegiance. I do not believe the Trinity tells us to divide the Word either.
Sound familiar, my friend?
I don't believe my pointing out the "process" violates anything you have understood from the context, do you?
Have a good day by the way. I may drop off quickly.
CB
Likewise, thank you .
Yes, indeed.
Good morning, Nang. Prayers for you today and thank you for yours, as I know you are a faithful Christian woman.