Why don't you Darby Followers try explaining Matt 5 to him. That's his issue with Dispensationalism.
Why don't you address your habitual lying, sissy looking Craigie-we have been asking you to explain this lie, for years, little arms one?
" That's not my argument.
I have never said that dispensationalism was "wrong" because of how old it was. I specifically said that no one taught about Christ coming back twice before Darby did."-Tet.
“I never said it was wrong for how old it is.”-Tet.
Vs.
"No matter how hard you try, you can't take away the fact that dispensationalism was invented by John Nelson Darby in the mid 1800's...Why are most dispensationalists afraid and/or embarrassed to acknowledge that Darby invented what they believe?"-Deceiver Tet.
"My argument is that if there is not one single trace of something for 1,800+ years by anyone, then it was invented.”-Tet.
'Dispensationalism didn't exist before Darby invented it in 1830."-weasel Craigie
Preterism and AD 70-ism did not exist until the 1800's, when J. Stuart Russell "invented" it.
Right, wimp?Why are most AD 70-isyts/Preterists afraid and/or embarrassed to acknowledge that Russell invented what they believe?