You flaming little devil, and whited wall, as all you do is plagiarize from your Preterist/AD 70 books, websites, stealing from Hannegraaf, Stuart, DeMar, Gentry, Curtis.................
Does Luke 19:44 disprove Preterism?
- Thread starter George Affleck
- Start date
You flaming little devil, and whited wall, as all you do is plagiarize from your Preterist/AD 70 books, websites, stealing from Hannegraaf, Stuart, DeMar, Gentry, Curtis.................
musterion
Well-known member
Yet his whole career on TOL is built upon he alone saying which verses are to be taken literally and which must only be taken figuratively.
Still waiting, for over 2 years, perveter Tellalie:
It is undisputed, that you "invented" this satanic "doctrine:"
-That the Lord Jesus Christ fulfilled the law, the law that he never taught,
-People are brought to Christ, in the past, and now, by being taught the law, by the Levites, by Christ rejecting Jews, and not by the LORD God, who,by definition, is the Lord Jesus Christ,
-That the Lord Jesus Christ lost His "flesh and bone" body, upon ascending to heaven, and thus is not a man today, is just some "disembodied spirit," and thus is not the mediator between God and man,
-That there is no redemption of the body,the adoption, promised to members of the boc, thus perverting the gospel of Christ, 1 Cor. 15:1-4 KJV...
-That the Roman army in AD 70, was the second coming, "the second time," and that the Roman army was looking for the return of the Saviour, for their salvation, as you assert...
And you cannot provide anyone, on record, that ever taught this satanic "doctrine" of yours, before you did.
Right Craigie pie?
Not a peep.
Show us some documentation, Craigie, re. this "The Roman army in 70 AD" was the second coming. Show us others teaching that, before you. Show us the books, from which you plagiarized that, devil boy.
I thought so. Craigie suffers another "death knell!!!!"
It is undisputed, that you "invented" this satanic "doctrine:"
-That the Lord Jesus Christ fulfilled the law, the law that he never taught,
-People are brought to Christ, in the past, and now, by being taught the law, by the Levites, by Christ rejecting Jews, and not by the LORD God, who,by definition, is the Lord Jesus Christ,
-That the Lord Jesus Christ lost His "flesh and bone" body, upon ascending to heaven, and thus is not a man today, is just some "disembodied spirit," and thus is not the mediator between God and man,
-That there is no redemption of the body,the adoption, promised to members of the boc, thus perverting the gospel of Christ, 1 Cor. 15:1-4 KJV...
-That the Roman army in AD 70, was the second coming, "the second time," and that the Roman army was looking for the return of the Saviour, for their salvation, as you assert...
And you cannot provide anyone, on record, that ever taught this satanic "doctrine" of yours, before you did.
Right Craigie pie?
Not a peep.
Show us some documentation, Craigie, re. this "The Roman army in 70 AD" was the second coming. Show us others teaching that, before you. Show us the books, from which you plagiarized that, devil boy.
I thought so. Craigie suffers another "death knell!!!!"
Last edited:
Vs.
"Spelling was never one of my strong points."-Craigie Tellalie
You fraud-you plagiarized that from other websites, "teacher."
Why do you follow "the inventions of men," Craigie? You taught us that-we learned that from you, Gentry-ite.
You fraud, hypocrite-you plagiarized that/copynpaste that from another website.
Why do you follow "the inventions of men," Craigie? You taught us that-we learned that from you, Gentry-ite.
How?
You don't think there are scriptures that describe it in a way that would be very noticeable? What do you do with this?
Luk 21:27 And then shall they see the Son of man coming in a cloud with power and great glory.
Mar 14:62 And Jesus said, I am: and ye shall see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven.
Mat 24:27 For as the lightning cometh out of the east, and shineth even unto the west; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.
1Th 4:16 For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first:
1Th 4:17 Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.
I'm fascinated by preterism. I think it makes sense of some scriptures that you have to twist around if you want it to mean something in the future. However, I think there are other passages that would cause trouble for a preterist view.
The view that might make the most sense is that Jesus did mean his own generation but things didn't come to pass as he and his followers thought. Most people will reject that as a possibility though.
The view that might make the most sense is that Jesus did mean his own generation but things didn't come to pass as he and his followers thought. Most people will reject that as a possibility though.
LoneStar
New member
To me, the 'you' and 'ye' in the verse is citing the Jewish people. The same people God sent the prophets.
That would be the false doctrine advocate, TeT.
Looks like your fellow posters, not only don't believe you, they don't
like you as well? What a guy. You're not exactly, a man of the people,
are ya?
That's on your "to do" list for this year.
I changed it to make your post more palatable.
He won't touch that question-I've been asking him that for over 2 years. He even agreed to answer it, in a thread, but bailed on it, as is his MO. He punted 4 threads, of which I started in his "honor," addressing his satanic assertions.
All the punk will "respond" with is "Darby....Figurative...Darby....Don't you believe the bible/"Jesus"/Paul?....Darby...You really think () is literal?.....You are a Darby follower, in denial....Of the flesh....Fulfilled AD 70...Darby....As yet, not one MADist can answer.....Darby....Fullfilled AD 70.....Nope....Er, no....I was a dispensationalist....Invented"......No one taught....before Darby.....Not one MADist can answer....Darby....You follow the teachings of men....Darby....Bullinger ........Darby.....Allegory....Hyperbole...One verse refutes MAD....Darby....."
He is a habitual liar, a charlatan, whose "ministry" is lying, hypocrisy, misquoting others, plagiarizing, sophistry, and deceit.
lifeisgood
New member
As soon as you set the example!!!!
I'm not the one quoting stuff out of context
That would be you
Why would you quote something that has nothing to do with a rapture, and claim it pertains to the rapture?
Are you not embarrassed by your post?
Your post was a joke
First the dead were raised...you concede that, then those who were alive and remain were caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord...you [have to] concede that
That is everybody, the whole church.
Never happened bud
Behold He comes in the clouds and every eye shall see Him