Cadry and Science
Cadry and Science
Dear noguru,
I had tons of hours of science in school. I know what is proposed by science. …
Michael
Michael, whenever someone questions your ability to understand science, you seem to take it as a personal slight. Be that as it may, your track record as regards science in this thread leaves little doubt that science is something you understand very poorly. Let me give two specific ways you are ignorant of science from just the last couple months in this thread.
Lack of Science Knowledge
Dear Kdall,
… If the tide is shoving water into a smaller area, like a bay, of course it will be a higher level.
Michael
Aristotle would have loved you. Don’t actually make observations, just think for a second, then make a declaration about how nature has to work. I realize you are at a disadvantage in parched and dry Phoenix, but close to me we have lots of bays – big and small. And you know what, maybe I just haven’t been paying attention, but I haven’t seen an iota of difference in the tides in any of them. Of course the government publishes tide tables for the fishermen ... but nope, I see they must be deceived too.
Dear Kdall,
… And the Earth has gravity, but the moon does not. …
Michael
When I first read this jewel I thought to myself, “No, no, not even Michael would say that.” But alas, you did. For you it seems, with your understanding of science, Newton’s law of gravity – from several centuries ago - is just a joke. And I presumed that, at your age, you might have actually watched some of video that was taken decades ago when men actually walked on the moon.
See Neil Armstrong taking that last step down the ladder to be the first man standing on the moon? Notice he actually jumped down off that step, and something – maybe magic – pulled him down that last foot or so to the surface of the moon. Then note shortly later when one of the astronauts was skipping down a slope – jumping up a couple of inches, and then (miracle of miracles) something magic pulled him right back down to the moon's surface.
Yes, you know science, Cadry - as it existed before the 1600s.
Cadry's Opinion Overrules Observations
Dear TracerBullet,
… My rejection of how man dates things is my own beliefs. I think he's wrong, whether it's a half-life, or a quarter-life, or a 16th-life. I don't trust it all one bit!!
Michael
Dear Kdall,
You've got to be kidding me? How would anyone know it was 220 million years ago? What a farce! Did they use uranium dating for that? Too much!!
Michael
Dear Kdall,
So their fossils lasted 220 million years?! Give it a rest!!
Michael
Dear Kdall,
I just think it is a huge amount of time that it is too much. It's not that I just don't like it. It's that I just don't believe it. You can't handle what happened 7,000 years ago, yet I'm supposed to believe something that happened 220 million years ago? You've got to be kidding, right?
Michael
Dear Kdall,
Then I guess we agree to disagree, because I don't believe that this Earth has been here for 220 million years! Believe whatever you like, yourself.
Michael
I like your consistency, Michael, in expressing your personal disbelief. I have had things in science I also balked at, but I soon learned that to actually be a scientist, my feelings mean nothing. Either I accept nature’s way, or I fail. And that is why you are not a scientist in any way, shape, or form. If you were, you would be a colossal failure, telling nature what you will accept and what you will not.