The church at Rome teaches that there is another name besides that of the Lord Jesus whereby men are saved:
"Since faith is the foundation, the source, of the gifts of God by which man is raised above the order of nature and is endowed with the dispositions requisite for life eternal, we are in justice bound to recognize the hidden influence of Mary in obtaining the gift of faith and its salutary cultivation - of Mary who brought the "author of faith" into this world and who, because of her own great faith, was called "blessed." "O Virgin most holy, none abounds in the knowledge of God except through thee; none, O Mother of God, attains salvation except through thee; none receives a gift from the throne of mercy except through thee" (ADIUTRICEM [On the Rosary], Encyclical of Pope Leo XIII, promulgated on September 5, 1895).
This is blasphemy of the worse kind!
Hey Jerry.
I disagree.
First, notice that the passage you cited doesn't say what you said it does. It doesn't say that anyone is saved by the name of Mary instead of by Jesus. Read that more carefully.
Second, if we read the encyclical in its entirety we can see that Leo isn't saying that Mary is another savior. He is saying that salvation comes
through her because Jesus Christ the Savior came to the world through her. We can know this because in the very sentence prior to the one you quoted he says that it is due to her faith and her "Yes" to God that she "brought 'the author of faith' into this world...". In other words, we obtain salvation through her because Jesus, the Savior came to us through her.
That should be no problem for Paul says the same thing in 1 Cor. 9:22: "I have become all things to all men, that
I might by all means save some."
Is Paul another Savior? Are we saved by the name of Paul? He said that he saves some, after all. Is Paul a heretic? Is Paul blaspheming?
No. He means the same thing Leo did. Paul can save some because it is through him that some can come to know Jesus. In that same sense we can say that our salvation comes through Mary because it was through her that the Savior came into the world.
So no. Leo wasn't committing blasphemy any more than Paul was.
Third, not everything a Pope thinks, says, or does is infallible. There are indications in this encyclical that, even though it carries the Pope's authority, it is up to each believer to decide if they want to have devotion to Mary. Elsewhere in this writing he states: "
Let each one weigh for himself, moreover, how fitting is this practice and how fruitful to himself;..."
Fourth, the Catechism of the Catholic Church makes its teaching pretty clear in paragraph 432:
"The name 'Jesus' signifies that the very name of God is present in the person of his Son...It is the divine name that alone brings salvation...so that 'there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved."
The Church does not teach what you say it does.
And you are misreading Leo's letter from 1895.
Peace.