Evangelion
New member
Onya Me Again. :up:
"BATTLE TALK" for BATTLE ROYALE #1 - Freak vs. me again
- Thread starter Nathon Detroit
- Start date
- Status
me again, did you get my PM about the length of the battle?
C
cirisme
Guest
Ev, ev, ev...
Ev, ev, ev...
Interesting twist of scripture... :down: I am specifically referring to John 6:47:
What would "believes in Me" include?
Believes in the crucifixion?
Believes in the resurrection?
Believes in any event in Jesus' life?
Believes in the fact that Jesus is Christ?
Believes in the fact that Jesus is deity?
If we believe in Jesus, we must believe in everything about Him, not what we like and don't like. And that would include His deity.
Ev, ev, ev...
Interesting twist of scripture... :down: I am specifically referring to John 6:47:
What would "believes in Me" include?
Believes in the crucifixion?
Believes in the resurrection?
Believes in any event in Jesus' life?
Believes in the fact that Jesus is Christ?
Believes in the fact that Jesus is deity?
If we believe in Jesus, we must believe in everything about Him, not what we like and don't like. And that would include His deity.
The length of "Battle Royale I" has been adjusted to 10 rounds.
I think 20 would have been waaaaayyyyy too long.
Both combatants were asked and they agreed.
I think 20 would have been waaaaayyyyy too long.
Both combatants were asked and they agreed.
Evangelion
New member
Cirisme -
It's called "context." I'm sorry if it disturbs you.
I know. And I am showing you that Jesus qualified his own words in another passage. You have to take both passages together - you can't just ignore the one you don't like. You need to reconcile them with each other.
I can. Can you?
Everything which he practiced and preached - and also, a firm belief in his Father.
Yep.
Yep.
Yep.
Yep.
Nope. Now you're assuming too much. I can acceot the previous examples, because Jesus also told us to believe on his works as well as his testimony. So I have a Biblical precedent for believing in those things which you have listed. But I see no Biblical precedent for the necessity of a belief in Jesus' alleged deity.
Agreed.
Only if you can prove that he claimed it.
So now you're back to Square One.
It's called "context." I'm sorry if it disturbs you.
I know. And I am showing you that Jesus qualified his own words in another passage. You have to take both passages together - you can't just ignore the one you don't like. You need to reconcile them with each other.
I can. Can you?
Everything which he practiced and preached - and also, a firm belief in his Father.
Yep.
Yep.
Yep.
Yep.
Nope. Now you're assuming too much. I can acceot the previous examples, because Jesus also told us to believe on his works as well as his testimony. So I have a Biblical precedent for believing in those things which you have listed. But I see no Biblical precedent for the necessity of a belief in Jesus' alleged deity.
Agreed.
Only if you can prove that he claimed it.
So now you're back to Square One.
C
cirisme
Guest
I agree.
John 8:58, 1 John 5:8.
Me again,
Really? I've dealt with brainwashed idoits like him before. He's so predictable and fun to play with.
P
Pilgrimagain
Guest
Again I will say that we, for the most part, are poor judges as to who is winning or will win because we can't step far enough away from our a prioris to look at it objectively.
So far Freak has not dealt with Me Agains rebuttal or assertion besides to repeat his original statements. Mean while, in terms of debate, Me Again has attempted to address each individual statement of Freaks while arguing his own point.
In the end, though this is fun to watch, no one will change their mind and the votes for best argument will be given not to the one who made the best argument but to the one who holds the position we already agree with.
Jaltus, as the resident Greek scholar, can you comment on Freaks appeal to authority? Are those scholars main stream and are the as respected as Freak claims?
Pilgrim
So far Freak has not dealt with Me Agains rebuttal or assertion besides to repeat his original statements. Mean while, in terms of debate, Me Again has attempted to address each individual statement of Freaks while arguing his own point.
In the end, though this is fun to watch, no one will change their mind and the votes for best argument will be given not to the one who made the best argument but to the one who holds the position we already agree with.
Jaltus, as the resident Greek scholar, can you comment on Freaks appeal to authority? Are those scholars main stream and are the as respected as Freak claims?
Pilgrim
P
Pilgrimagain
Guest
On an interesting side note, most of the staff here at my church are getting into this as well. You may see some of them posting in the near future. It's cool to be a trend setter!
Pilgrim
Pilgrim
me again
New member
Divergent Views ?
Divergent Views ?
Stirring the pot while it boils?
Hey, maybe Jay will officially tell me that I'm hell bound?
Divergent Views ?
Stirring the pot while it boils?
- 1Th 4:16
For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first:
Hey, maybe Jay will officially tell me that I'm hell bound?
bill betzler
New member
Justin,
I was with me again until that part you just caught.
I bet he has trouble proving Michael is Jesus.
bill
I was with me again until that part you just caught.
I bet he has trouble proving Michael is Jesus.
bill
theophilus
Well-known member
Justin,
Justin,
Seventh Day Adventists believe Jesus is Michael.
So do the JW's.
Justin,
Seventh Day Adventists believe Jesus is Michael.
So do the JW's.
bill betzler
New member
Me again,
Is Jesus also the trumpet of God? It really makes more sense to see Jesus descend while the voice and trumpet make their sounds of announcement of His presence.
bill
Is Jesus also the trumpet of God? It really makes more sense to see Jesus descend while the voice and trumpet make their sounds of announcement of His presence.
bill
- Status