Alt-Trump

glorydaz

Well-known member
:chuckle:

My point was about how little I post on this, the "Politics" Forum on TOL.

I mostly post on the "ECT" Forum on TOL.

And every so often I'll post on the "Religion," or on the "And Everything Else" Forum.

I had begun to think you were a bit more efficient than most in your ability to note finer distinctions between things.

But I guess I have ya beat on this one, at least, at this time :D

Danoh, you big liar. Since Trump came into your life, you have obsessed over him right here in Politics.
 

glorydaz

Well-known member
No need to wait. You asked

How about you plainly say what you mean. Is Trump a sexual predator like Clinton or is he only guilty of "male locker-room talk"?



I'm sure you're doing it on purpose...repeatedly. :plain:



I'm not. You were. That's why I quoted you repeatedly bringing up Clinton when the person you were replying to was only ever discussing Trump.



It has been far too easy to point out your hypocrisy in this regard, unfortunately.


At least the Donald had the guts to get rid of his wife when he got tired of her. Clinton had his wife's permission, but he was gutless. And Clinton did force himself on women. Trump was merely an ogler and a groper. There wasn't any force that I ever heard. If we knew half the things men do, we'd all have to just sit back and shut up.
 

Tambora

Get your armor ready!
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
Well, if Trump is indeed a sexual predator, than he is unfit for office....just as Clinton was unfit for office....
Yes.

But my my how the outrage was much different when votes were cast for Bill.
No mass public outcry making it into a scandalous mega news story.
No mass public outcry screaming that anyone that voted for him was a deplorable person with low moral standards.
One has to wonder why it is so much of an outrage now.

Not to say that either of them are innocent of womanizing.
But when the Dems set their standard of what sort of man they approve of in the White House, it's kinda ironic they would oppose the same type of man now.

And when Bush took office, a family man that was not an adulterous womanizer, Dems wanted no part of him.

Obviously having a non-womanizer in the White House is not high on their priority list for the job.
What changed to make it such an issue for them now? :idunno:


But still, I am glad all this is coming to the surface.
If any have done this and they have not yet been accused, I hope they are losing sleep wondering if today will be the day they are exposed.
And I hope any others that demonstrate this type of behavior are exposed and shamed for it.
And if any women have lied about their experience with these men, I hope they are exposed and shamed too.
And if any women are throwing themselves at these married men, I hope they are exposed and shamed too.
 

Tambora

Get your armor ready!
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
Trump did say his self-deluded base will excuse any unbecoming conduct on his part - even out in the open murder.
Wonder how he got that notion?
Maybe from watching a previous President keep right on doing it even in the White House while he was President.
 

patrick jane

BANNED
Banned
Apparently that is the response to the most recent elections and the wave of anti-Trumpism at the polls. :D More diversity which includes more women being elected to office. :D
:rotfl: 2 state seats in 2 states that voted Clinton and a woman that's actually a man.
 

annabenedetti

like marbles on glass
Women do not just sit back and shut up. They rise to the occasion and lead. :D

DOKFbrOW4AARYqW.jpg
 

Tambora

Get your armor ready!
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
Socialism is great, until you run out of someone else's money
 

jgarden

BANNED
Banned
At least the Donald had the guts to get rid of his wife when he got tired of her. Clinton had his wife's permission, but he was gutless. And Clinton did force himself on women. Trump was merely an ogler and a groper. There wasn't any force that I ever heard. If we knew half the things men do, we'd all have to just sit back and shut up.

BBEOO2X.img


- at least the Donald had the guts to get rid of his wife when he got tired of her

- Trump was merely an ogler and a groper

- there wasn't any force that I ever heard

The "deplorables" just keep shifting the bar lower and lower for this President to justify the unjustifiable!

Any day "The Donald" isn't caught in a bold-faced lie, doesn't insult a "gold-star" parent and/or labelled as a "MORON" by his own Secretary of State, is now considered a "win!"
 
Last edited:

patrick jane

BANNED
Banned
- at least the Donald had the guts to get rid of his wife when he got tired of her

- Trump was merely an ogler and a groper

- there wasn't any force that I ever heard

The "deplorables" just keep shifting the bar lower and lower for this President to justify the unjustifiable!

Any day "The Donald" isn't caught in a bold-faced lie, doesn't insult a "gold-star" parent and/or labelled as a "MORON" by his own Secretary of State, is now considered a "win!"
Bill Clinton
 

glorydaz

Well-known member
This is sick:

At least Anna only puts her foot in her mouth a few times a day, while playing the hypocrite trying to convince people she has never done anything she'd be horrified were we to find out about it. Too bad she isn't important enough to get her name printed in the news.

I know, it's sick how hypocrites like Anna act so offended about what others do. :nono:
 
Top