Search results

I've been, reluctantly, reading some flat Earth nonsense (sorry, there's just not any other word for it) on various websites and I've come to the conclusion that the entire idea is indeed Satanic, or at the very least, demonic. And I'm 100% not kidding about that. Here's the best example of...

So what's the form of your argument here? Pythagoras was a pagan therefore everything he said was false and everything everyone said that can be at all linked to him is also false. Are you intentionally calling into question the validity of the pythagorian theorum or was that just an...

I am a rational being, that's who. I can decide what is and is not a rational worldview that same way I decide that anything else is rational, by reason. That which is not verifiable is not science, Dave. I'm not I understand the point you're making here. Are you equating the fact that the...

Dave, You are not responding to the arguments presented. All you do is present more lunacy that needs to be refuted which you then ignore (mostly) and add even more lunacy. There is a name for this technique. It's called muddying the water. People with rational worldviews don't need such...

Allow you to continue to think that evolution is observable.

You think I'm stupid. That puts me at the advantage.

Ridiculous.

As this website proves multiple times a day, saying it doesn't make it so. Evolutionists can say anything they want. It doesn't make it true nor even scientific. There are actually several environmental factors that have been shown to be able to affect DNA. It does not create it but that...

The force of gravity (F) between two masses is equal to the gravitational constant (G) times the mass of both bodies divided by the square of the distance between the two bodies. From Wikipedia... In modern language, the law states: Every point mass attracts every single other point mass by a...

I despise the term 'microevolution' but otherwise, this statement is true and can be easily observed. This statement is only true in the fact that it accurately describes the concept of macroevolution. Macroevolution not only has not been observed, it cannot be observed and is therefore not...

No one has suggested that an analogy proves anything. It doesn't change the fact that the analogy is perfect. No, it doesn't. I've already directly addressed this. The mechanism holding the atmosphere to the Earth is the exact same mechanism that is holding you to the Earth. GRAVITY The fact...

A short Dandelion weed is not a hybrid version of a tall one. It's simply a different expression of the Dandelion weed's genetic code. And yet, in spite of not being a "hybrid", the shorter one's have a survival advantage in my front yard because there are these crazy humans that come along with...

Nope! It is not "absolutely" true. It is relatively true. For what feels like the 50th time. Motion of an object is only meaningful RELATIVE to another object. So your brother's face is motionless RELATIVE to the car. It is still moving relative to the road on which the car is driving. Since the...

Excellent point.

Dave, What, specifically, do you find contradictory about the concept of gravity? I emphasize "the concept" because I don't believe either of us are qualified to debate Einstein's theories and, even if we were, I think you and I are mostly in agreement in regards to the contradictory nature...

You know I do. Why do you ask? If you are attempting to suggest that the theory of evolution beleives that nature makes decisions via some sort of thought process then, again, I have to wonder just what it is that you're up too here, David. I seriously reject the notion that you are this...

Your brother's face is moving. It's in a moving car and unless the car is leaving your bother's face behind then his face is moving too, as is the air in the car. Your breath is inducing even more movement which is relative to the car and everything else in the car including your bother's face...

Yes, I did. I really don't like the format on this new version of vBulletin. The habits I've formed on it cause me to miss quite a lot of posts, I suspect. Basically, because of the limited time I have to do this - usually in the mornings just before work - if you don't quote my post or mention...

Incidentally, I almost didn't post the above because it concedes ground that isn't justified. Let me explain... The fact that very few (or even none - if there were actually none at all) flights go directly over the South Pole only proves that there is no demand for planes to do so. It isn't...

Dave, I last asked you just what it was about gravity that you considered to be self-contradictory. Did you ever answer? If so, can you tell me the post number, I seem to have missed it. Clete