Search results

I'm curious as to how group prayers are happening during the epidemic. (Please don't drag the 'there's no pandemic' argument into this thread- that's not the point, and there are plenty of threads about that). For example: I have been participating in outdoor prayers since this began. These are...

Let's make this clear: 1. What exactly have you 'been saying for many months'? 2. What exactly does the AMA now say? 3. What exactly did the AMA say in the past? I suggest that you read what the AMA wrote before you answer the above.

I join culture warrior in thinking that despite your OP, it is not "well worth your time to watch" this two hour video. I rather have better things to do with my time.

Here's an HCQ study of interest: A Cluster-Randomized Trial of Hydroxychloroquine for Prevention of Covid-19 https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2021801?query=WB&fbclid=IwAR3UGDYsELwGWKqrkiz2L8wcxYZ2nfiL0Z8y55Y4RH5RkNfLUWJkCK1ItyI

I do not trust the MSM- but I trust the conspiracy nutcase sites less. What I do trust are health organizations that publish hard numbers. Here's a local example (Israel): If I open the popular website ynet, they will have headlines about COVID- and include numbers. But they need sensational...

I see the UK is making good progress on vaccinations now.

I consider accuracy important, especially when it relates to public health. Most of this aren't things that I just "disagree with"- they are plain wrong. The PEG example was the most blatant- so I won't let it go. It helps that I'm a chemist by training. Is this my life's mission- of course...

The problem lies in the fact (yes, it's a fact) that there's an epidemic, and the situation is very dynamic. The people who have to make policy decisions don't have the luxury of waiting for months until the data is near -perfect. We all have to do the best we can with what there is.

Please actually read what it says. They had recommended that doctors avoid using that treatment. They rescinded that statement (because of more data- which is how things work in science), and said it is OK to prescribe it- they don't 'recommend' it, since the data is inconclusive- they leave it...

What type of an argument is this? Because I read the papers and understand that some of these treatments are not effective- I am against finding treatment? Nonsense- this is just a more sophisticated way of calling me a 'retard'. I know that there has been great progress made in treatment, as...

ffreloader, you treat medical science as if it were religious dogma. The AMA recommends the best that they know at the time- irrespective of Donald Trump or what the press says. As it is, the report that you are so excited about doesn't recommend this treatment. It recommends allowing doctors to...

ffreeloader- you find time to start new erroneous threads- but no time to respond to this classic?

Anna has done me the favor. I'm running out of time and energy chasing after all these alternate realities. What is the theory behind all this? That the official medical community is a bunch of idiots? That they've been paid off? That PEG thread (which I never got an answer to) is an extreme...

pick and choose what part you report?

do you ever actually open your own links and read them?

Here's some more info: https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/statement-on-ivermectin/

The medical community is not hiding any information, or concealing miracle cures. A simple search will clarify things. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210201/Ivermectin-may-not-be-the-e28098silver-bullete28099-antiviral-against-COVID-19.aspx

sigh OK- I'm not going to bother putting you on ignore. You're not worth it.

Calling me 'retard' isn't very specific. I do not think you are stupid. You have chosen lies and ignorance. They make you feel good.

Just the facts. I'm sorry that reality strikes you as 'retarded'