Search results

The transcript includes an inaccuracy. One you posted separately. The vaccines do not contain PEG. What other falsehoods and speculations are in that video?

The foolishness is in judging these claims in the Court of Public Opinion. Period. For anybody.

Nobody should be held to a false standard. This foolishness was wrong for Kavanaugh, and it is wrong for Biden. Or don't you believe in actual morality- only revenge?

Um, have you read my posts? There is no antifreeze (ethylene glycol) in the vaccine. Nor is there "PEG" polyethylene glycol in the vaccine. What is in there is a lipid called polyethylene glycol [PEG] 2000 dimyristoyl glycerol [DMG] . The OP is wrong. Incorrect. A misunderstanding of...

..but if somebody accuses a Left president of rape- believe them?

Right. It isn't used in antifreeze (as per the OP). that would be the monomer, ethylene glycol.

We are fortunate. Got both doses already. about 17% of the country has. 33% have gotten at least one dose. Right now vaccination rates are about 2% of the country each day! So far, as far as I know, very few who have gotten vaccinated have gotten ill, and none critically ill. It will take time...

Hey! Guess what? I read it- but not carefully enough! "The Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine contains the following ingredients: messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA), lipids (SM-102, polyethylene glycol [PEG] 2000 dimyristoyl glycerol [DMG], cholesterol, and 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine...

I did read it. There are no secrets here. What exactly is making you so worried? Maybe this? "the known and potential benefits of the product outweigh the known and potential risks of the product." Edit: By the way, there is no need to call me 'stupid' all the time. I'm not, and besides being...

You honestly think that Moderna, Pfizer, the CDC, and FDA are deliberately poisoning us? Where are the millions of poisoned victims? Here, in Israel, about 1/3 of the population has received at least one dose of the vaccine. I'd think somebody would have noticed....

Well, since some people think he's 'creepy', clearly he is a rapist.

The "technicality" I am talking about is "evidence".

Sure it does. Your post #3 is factually wrong. It's OK to admit an error.

Traitors?

Indeed, a major problem in cases like this. The court of public opinion can easily convict somebody based on rumors and lies. And it has a cost- people have lost their jobs because of this, and it has turned into a political tool- one which both sides are apparently all too willing to use.

OK, Mr. Scientist. So how come we don't get 100% positive results from the test?

So let's scrutinize the claim as carefully as we would if these were the "mockingbird MSM". I suggest this article: https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/human-dna-alone-does-not-produce-a-positive-result-on-the-rt-pcr-test-for-sars-cov-2/

How about reading some real science, instead of the Comments on some popular article?

Here's the Bush motorcade. Check about minute 2:

You use words like "reasonable", "irrational", "very suspect" so freely. There is nothing to prevent somebody with other political views truing around and using them in another direction, That is why the "technicality" is important.