Somewhat.
That said, it's a prudential matter which appertains to historic, contingent events. There's nothing intrinsically wrong about refusing certain people entry into a country. There's nothing intrinsically wrong with the death penalty. There's nothing intrinsically wrong about using bombs against military aggressors.
Even the pope would agree with me about those things. He has to.
What I am pathologically inclined to say, of course, is that we should nuke the entire middle east into utter oblivion. Personally, if I may speak in terms of Warhammer 40k, I am inclined, pathologically, to think that exterminatus (see the video at the bottom of this posting) is the quickest, surest, most expedient means of solving the muslim problem.
Seeing the entire middle east just vanish in a puff of smoke would positively thrill me. The idea of Islam itself, all of a sudden, becoming a non-entity, except, of course, for a bitter memory? Love it.
I am inclined to say, with Cato the Elder, "Cartago delenda est (Carthage must be destroyed)!"
That said, even I am forced to admit that such a thing would be gravely and intrinsically contrary to the natural law.
But bars on immigration? The death penalty for certain classes of criminals? Bombing runs against legitimate military targets?
All of that is fair game. The question is precisely what circumstances justify them. That's a prudential question.
Of course, even this raises a problem: the pope is much more virtuous than I am, on both the natural and supernatural levels.
On the other hand, it does seem to me that he is further removed from the circumstances at hand.
