Woman in Germany dragged into Subway by crowd of Muslims and brutally raped.
Nobody can condone rape or the mistreatment of women BUT does anyone seriously think that "Narazoo" would have shown any interest in this video if didn't fan the flames of fear and mistrust against Moslem refugees?
Nazaroo can answer for himself:
If I had come across the video and it wasn't Muslims as perpetrators,
I'd have started a similar thread with a different title.
The Title let me remind you, came from the Youtube title, which was fraudulent,
not from me.
I have certainly posted many many threads on non-Muslim centered topics.
Your claim is invalid.
As Christians, we are taught to show love (The Greatest Commandment)
and charity (The Greatest Gift) toward our neighbors - particularly those in need.
When we extend a helping hand to aid a refugee,
doesn't Scripture teach that this is same as extending it to Christ?
Your statement is a trivial truism.
No Christian would argue against or be ignorant of the gospel basics.
But its an incomplete gospel, since the New Testament also speaks strongly against
lying and fraud, and aiding and abetting evil conspirators.
The issues have always been:
(1) who are the REAL refugees?
Its been shown and its an open fact that the majority of the 'Syrian refugees' are
not from Syria and not refugees. They are not immediately fleeing from that warzone,
but are dissatisfied with their economic position in Turkey, Kurdistan, Pakistan, Afghanistan,
India, Morocco, Egypt, Lebanon, Iraq, and Iran, and also Eastern European countries.
Its been shown that they are not real 'refugees' but middle class and working class families
with means and resources who can raise thousands of dollars per family to
pay for illegal human smuggling operations, nice clothing etc., and who are demanding
welfare enrollment, high grade housing in Europe, and freedom to impose their own laws
upon countries that already have laws, legal systems, community values and democracy.
(2) How many of the 'refugee' claimants are fakes?
Its been admitted by the 'Syrian refugees' themselves that some 60% of them have
destroyed their own passports and I.D. to frustrate police from finding out where they
are from, and their previous criminal and political histories.
Its been acknowledged that over half of them refuse to be fingerprinted or photographed
for identification purposes.
Its been established by actual polls of the 'refugees' that 7 to 15% of them support
ISIS and other terrorist extremist groups, like Al Queda etc.
(3) What is the correct solution to the problem?
It is obvious that mass immigration of many millions of people from the Middle East and
Africa to Europe is not going to solve anything.
Instead it will greatly damage all the European infrastructure, overload any health and
housing meant for the poor, and exhaust any resources meant for real people in need.
It is admitted by real Syrian refugees in camps that the majority of them want to return '
to their own country Syria and have their property and their lives back in a peaceful zone.
The correct solution is to secure a non-combat zone in most of Syria and allow them
to return to their homes and rebuild damaged infrastructures and support there.
How can "Narazoo" possibly reconcile his campaign to demonize Moslem refugees
with Christ's "Parable of the Good Samaritan?"
Simple:
In the
Parable of the Good Samaritan,
the man set upon by robbers was
(1) a real victim of a dastardly crime, in need of first aid.
(2) a man who was innocent himself of any crime and unwilling to perpetrate crimes on others.
(3) a man who stayed in his own country of origin and community.
The Good Samaritan was:
(1) A man who investigated a potential crime and found out the real facts.
(2) A man who had the means to help the victim and an economic plan to pay for medical treatment.
(3) A man who did not take the victim, a stranger into his own house and put his own
family at risk, but prudently paid for temporary lodgings in the local area of origin.
(4) A man who expected those in charge to be responsible economically in providing
assistance to the victim.
The people who refused to help were:
(1) people who were not Christians. If you think modern governments represent Christians or Christian interests, you are a dunce.
(2) people who were posing as traditionally 'O.T.' religious (not as Christians),
and were hypocrites and actors.
(3) people who were selfish and not risk-takers, because they had no reason to do so.
It was Jesus who with His new religion provided the motive to take risks, with the
backing of God. But unless you sign onto Jesus' new religious teaching, you can't
be motivated to take such risks.
Its not 'demonizing' someone to point out that
they are guilty of widespread fraud and other violent crimes.
