Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Until "most" people who have same sex attractions come forward and tell us that they haven't been sexually molested (or in many cases emotionally abused), I'll just have to go with personal testimonies and various studies showing differently. (I love the index).
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4417530&postcount=3
No doubt you will continue to gather them up, and perhaps enjoy doing it.
If only one person were to seek spiritual and psychological therapy to help them overcome same sex attraction because of these links and personal testimonies that I've been posting and will continue to post, then I've done my job.
However the inconvenient truth for you is that gay people will always exceed the numbers of sexual offences against children committed mainly by straight men.
With heterosexuals consisting of 98% of the population, one would think that you are correct...but you're not.
Besides, the LGBTQueer movement is an organized pedophile/pederast movement, that's what I've been showing since Part 1 and will continue to show.
But if you enjoy the lurid details of personal testimony aCW then don't let me stop you.
Unfortunately it's necessary to show what horror these innocent children went through at the hands of homosexuals in order to motivate others to do something about it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Again: What other factors played into David Pickup's same sex desires if it wasn't because he was sexually and emotionally abused as a child?
Same sex desires just are how it is for some people?
Brilliant Al, absolutely brilliant.
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
UK LGBTQueer activist Peter Tatchell couldn't have said it better.
Oh no, not this drivel again.
Once again, I've never condoned paedophilia of any kind nor been a supporter of Tatchell but oh look, in this very (edited?) clipping, it seems apparently that neither does Tatchell.
To quote him directly:
Source
Thank you for the link to UK homosexual activist Peter the pedophile Tatchell's website, it's literally a goldmine.
Let's address some of the things that he's written:
Age of consent issue
It is true that I support reducing the legal consent age to 14. But I support 14 in order to end the criminalisation of the many young people who have sexual contact with each other from this age onwards. .
Gee, I wonder if Peter the pedophile knows that if the age of consent is lowered to 14 and an adult is caught having sex with that youth, that he (the adult)
can't be prosecuted?
Here's a good one from Peter the pedophile's article:
My Guardian letter cited examples of youths in Papuan tribes and some of my friends who, when they were under 16, had sex with adults (over 18s), but who do not feel they were harmed.
I was not endorsing their viewpoint but merely stating that they had a different perspective from the mainstream opinion about inter-generational sex. They have every right for their perspective to be heard.
Now mature adults, they look back on their under-age sexual relations with older people and do not feel that they were harmed. If this is their considered view, we should respect their evaluation (while also recognising that some people are harmed by early sexual experiences).
http://www.petertatchell.net/lgbt_r...tement-of-clarification-by-Peter-Tatchell.htm
Again, in the opinion of leading UK homosexual activist Peter Tatchell, not all children are harmed by adult-child sex (nor is it "unwanted or abusive").
I'll be linking Peter the pedophile's article to the "Pedophile/Pederasty" section of the index if anyone would like to review it at a later date.
Thanks again for the link Al.