Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized! Part 3

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
As I've shown and will continue to show, violence is a big part of the homosexual lifestyle. Violence is part of "controlling" other people Doper.

Quote:
Originally Posted by shagster01
So your desire to "control" other humans morality and who they can and cannot sleep with is a violent behavior.

And since you always connect violence with homosexuals. . .

Bump to aCW.

Why is your act of violence via control acceptable and theirs not?

Because my "act of violence" (i.e. righteous laws) are an act of love. I've mentioned many times throughout this 3 part thread that in many aspects government is an extension of a family unit.
A loving mother and father wouldn't let their children engage in any behavior that they wanted to, because they know that those destructive behaviors would end up killing them. Governments that legislate righteously (via God's Word) are no different.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

So, we are to judge the morality of our sexual preferences by how many people die of STDS per preference.....

I'm just pointing out the disproportionate amount of disease that those who engage in homosexual behavior contract.

Seems you have a GOD that is pissed off at heterosexuals.. see below.

In fact put this fact, with the fact that there are like 15-1 the hetero to hom sexual chastisements and warnings in the Bible. Anyway you turn, your reasoning kills us heterofolks....

I think I'd prefer you shut the heck up and go back to your Church in Westboro.

Freddie's dead (that's what I said).

HIV Statistics:...

Refer to the table of contents regarding AIDS. Look for the entry that says "Matt Foreman states that AIDS is a gay disease" and then read on from there.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

(2) a deliberate program by the West to depopulate Africa
via perpetual internal conflicts, zero infrastructure and zero healthcare,
and the sponsored spreading of disease using every possible vector
and technology, in order to leave it open to exploitation by corporations., and military combines.

(3) The systemic spread of AIDS-like viruses through fake vaccination programs.



- its hardly a surprise that 95% of alleged 'AIDS' victims are blacks
living in Africa, and they happen to be mostly heterosexuals, mostly
women and children (the murder rate against males is out of control).

Let me spell it out for you:
It only takes ONE promiscuous and murderous soldier
to rape a whole village of defenseless women and even children,
NONE of whom are promiscuous, and yet,
this one soldier would have managed to infect over 100 people.
So while only 1 jerk was promiscuous, 100 people end up with the virus,
because they can't defend themselves against an armed soldier in
a place like Africa.

(Sigh, once a nutcase conspiracy theorist, always a nutcase conspiracy theorist).

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
"Real life"? What's "real life"? Pornography is a "victimless crime", ask one of the many Libertarians on here and they'll tell you that it is.

If you asked me I'd say yes and no.
Much of pornography is reasonably safe and provides an honest income for some people but otoh some of it is exploitative, but then there is always good and bad people in all walks of life aCW, as you are a particularly shining example of.

(It makes me wonder if Al sits at home watching "dodgy, dodgy films").
http://www.digitalspy.com/celebrity...r-over-child-pornography.html#~oKqvc6Rkd8dz62

 

[shagster01]

Because my "act of violence" (i.e. righteous laws) are an act of love.

Anyone can claim and truly believe the same thing.

I've mentioned many times throughout this 3 part thread that in many aspects government is an extension of a family unit.

No it isn't.

A loving mother and father wouldn't let their children engage in any behavior that they wanted to, because they know that those destructive behaviors would end up killing them.

At a certain point (ie when the child reaches adulthood, or at least marriage) the parents no longer get to control the situation.

Read genesis 2:24.

Governments that legislate righteously (via God's Word) are no different.

Do you have scripture reference?

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior

Because my "act of violence" (i.e. righteous laws) are an act of love.

Anyone can claim and truly believe the same thing.

Anyone that writes their own moral code.


Quote:
I've mentioned many times throughout this 3 part thread that in many aspects government is an extension of a family unit.

No it isn't.

Yes it is.

No it isn't.

Yes it is.

isn't.

is.


Quote:
A loving mother and father wouldn't let their children engage in any behavior that they wanted to, because they know that those destructive behaviors would end up killing them.

At a certain point (ie when the child reaches adulthood, or at least marriage) the parents no longer get to control the situation.

Duh (someone's hitting the vaporizer a bit hard tonight).


Quote:
Governments that legislate righteously (via God's Word) are no different.

Do you have scripture reference?

Here's 3 articles from part 1 that explains it well.

http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3301996&postcount=4012
http://www.westwalkerchurchofchrist.org/sermons/2008/THREEDIVINEINSTITUTIONS.pdf
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3310948&postcount=4195

 

[alwight]

(It makes me wonder if Al sits at home watching "dodgy, dodgy films").
http://www.digitalspy.com/celebrity...r-over-child-pornography.html#~oKqvc6Rkd8dz62

It seems pretty clear what you spend your time doing aCW, does it make you happy? lain:

 

[drbrumley]

So true!

 

[Arthur Brain]

Welcome back to the thread nog. I mentioned to Art Brain when he was on a 'lipstick lesbian' rant (at least the boy is thinking about girls, even if they are lesbo), that you mentioned in part 2 that you're into voyeurism. I can't remember if you said that you like to watch two guys getting it on or two women.

Please clarify while I search for the post.

You have a very strange idea of what constitutes a "rant"...

So you enjoyed watching two homosexuals (or more) go at it, as long as they were female. I guess watching two guys give each other HIV/AIDS, anal cancer, etc. wasn't your "thing" ey? (Obviously nog is a homophobic bigot).

What he's admitted to is a very common male heterosexual fantasy, so of course it's going to be women, not men. If you think otherwise perhaps you can explain why the glamour/porn industry has had it as a staple requirement of business for decades. If there wasn't a market for it it wouldn't sell. The reason it sells is...?

Even you should be able to answer that...

 

[shagster01]

Anyone that writes their own moral code.

As opposed to you who writes everyone's moral code for them. . .

I've mentioned many times throughout this 3 part thread that in many aspects government is an extension of a family unit.

Yes it is.

Yes it is.

is.

So when people complain about "Big Brother" you actually think it is the government's job to be big brother.

A loving mother and father wouldn't let their children engage in any behavior that they wanted to, because they know that those destructive behaviors would end up killing them.



Duh (someone's hitting the vaporizer a bit hard tonight).



Governments that legislate righteously (via God's Word) are no different.

So if people leave their mom and dad when they get married, and the government is "no different," you just made a great argument for the government staying out of things like regulating gay marriage.

Good job aCW, you finally made a good point.

Here's 3 articles from part 1 that explains it well.

And HERE IS AN ARTICLE for you that explains it well.

 

[Nazaroo]

(Sigh, once a nutcase conspiracy theorist, always a nutcase conspiracy theorist).

*sigh* - once bought out and aligned with a satanic government,
always aligned and bought out by a satanic government.

The eugenicists and NWO bankers are not your friends.

They'll take your arms, and your country, and leave you
overrun by illegal immigrants.


America, the Great Experiment in Freemasonic 'Democracy', lasted barely 200 years.

Your story has an eerie parallel to the ancient Spartans:

Simonides epitaph on the Kolonos hillock, which is the site believed to be the location of the last stand - Image courtesy of Vasilis Linidis Ω ΞΕΙΝ ΑΓΓΕΛΛΕΙΝ ΛΑΚΕΔΑΙΜΟΝΙΟΙΣ ΟΤΙ ΤΗΔΕ ΚΕΙΜΕΘΑ ΤΟΙΣ ΚΕΙΝΩΝ ΡΗΜΑΣΙ ΠΕΙΘΟΜΕΝΟΙ ​ (GO TELL THE SPARTANS PASSERBY, THAT HERE OBEDIENT TO THEIR LAWS WE LIE) [FONT=verdana, arial, sans-serif]The epitaph as written above and whose English translation appears below the Greek transcription was written by the poet Simonides, son of Leoprepes from the island of Creos. It is dedicated to the 300 Spartans and appears on the memorial at Thermopylae (see below). Most fittingly, the plaque is decorated with the Green Laconian stone (Lapis Lacedaemonius) which was imported from the south of Sparta as described by Pausanias. This memorial is situated atop the hillock where it is believed that the Spartans and Thespians made their last stand. A large concentration of arrowheads were located by the Greek archaeologist Spyridon Marinatos in 1939 which in all probability confirms the location.[/FONT] ​ The plaque at Thermopylae whose inscription is dedicated by Simonides to the 300 Spartans - Image courtesy of Vasilis Linidis The enconium below also composed by the poet Simonides and dedicated to the 300 Spartans was recorded by the historian Diodorus of Sicily - From Professor Peter Green's book 'Diodorus Siculus, Books 11-12.37.1'

 

[aCultureWarrior]

So true!

LOL!!! Excellent point!

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Welcome back to the thread nog. I mentioned to Art Brain when he was on a 'lipstick lesbian' rant (at least the boy is thinking about girls, even if they are lesbo), that you mentioned in part 2 that you're into voyeurism. I can't remember if you said that you like to watch two guys getting it on or two women.

Please clarify while I search for the post.

You have a very strange idea of what constitutes a "rant"...

"To talk foolishly"
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/ranting


Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
So you enjoyed watching two homosexuals (or more) go at it, as long as they were female. I guess watching two guys give each other HIV/AIDS, anal cancer, etc. wasn't your "thing" ey? (Obviously nog is a homophobic bigot).

What he's admitted to is a very common male heterosexual [PERVERT] fantasy, so of course it's going to be women, not men. If you think otherwise perhaps you can explain why the glamour/porn industry has had it as a staple requirement of business for decades. If there wasn't a market for it it wouldn't sell. The reason it sells is...?

Fixed that for you Art. Watching two homosexuals "getting it on" is something that perverts do. I would imagine that there are quite a few lesbos out there that enjoy those magazines and videos as well.

 

[Arthur Brain]

"To talk foolishly"
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/ranting

But that's something you do on a daily basis...

Fixed that for you Art. Watching two homosexuals "getting it on" is something that perverts do. I would imagine that there are quite a few lesbos out there that enjoy those magazines and videos as well.

Well if they were lesbian they might well enjoy the same fantasy that a plethora of heterosexual men have.

 

[alwight]

Rant: "to speak or say something in a very loud, aggressive, or bombastic way, usually at length and repetitively."

Pervert: "somebody whose sexual behaviour is considered unacceptably deviant"

Deviant: "diverging sharply from a customary, traditional, or generally accepted standard, or displaying such divergent behaviour"

aCultureWarrior: "see "Homophobia" also "Bigot""

 

[TracerBullet]

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
As I've shown and will continue to show, violence is a big part of the homosexual lifestyle. Violence is part of "controlling" other people Doper.





Because my "act of violence" (i.e. righteous laws) are an act of love. I've mentioned many times throughout this 3 part thread that in many aspects government is an extension of a family unit.
A loving mother and father wouldn't let their children engage in any behavior that they wanted to, because they know that those destructive behaviors would end up killing them. Governments that legislate righteously (via God's Word) are no different.

and here is a fine example of your "acts of love"

The girl told investigators that her mom gave her three chances to prove that she wasn’t a lesbian. After seeing her daughter in a baseball cap Haro allegedly told her daughter “not to wear boy clothes anymore, only girl clothes,” and that she would have to start attending church with her grandmother.


the girl was then forced to undress in front of her mother to “show her she was a woman, and not a man.” The girl told investigators that her mother then demanded that she perform sex acts on herself, so the girl did so out of fear that her mother was going to sexually assault her after her mother threatened to use a plunger to “make her feel what it’s like to have sex.”

I'm sure you are disappointed with Magdo Haro, after all her daughter is still alive. Unlike the great parents of Zachary Dutro who showed that they really loved their son

 

[shagster01]

and here is a fine example of your "acts of love"


I'm sure you are disappointed with Magdo Haro, after all her daughter is still alive. Unlike the great parents of Zachary Dutro who showed that they really loved their son

Well it's clear (using aCW's logic) that this proves that heterosexuality leads to more violence.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Anyone that writes their own moral code.

As opposed to you who writes everyone's moral code for them. . .

We've found out that following one's own moral beliefs hasn't worked out too well for the 57 million unborn babies that have been murdered in the womb in the past 41 years Doper. (And yes, you can murder someone that hasn't been born).


Quote:
I've mentioned many times throughout this 3 part thread that in many aspects government is an extension of a family unit.

So when people complain about "Big Brother" you actually think it is the government's job to be big brother.

Legislating righteous laws doesn't necessarily make a government a "Big Brother". Keep in mind that when a teen leaves home and goes astray, mom and dad can't do a thing about it. That's where righteous laws come in.



Quote:
A loving mother and father wouldn't let their children engage in any behavior that they wanted to, because they know that those destructive behaviors would end up killing them.

Governments that legislate righteously (via God's Word) are no different.

So if people leave their mom and dad when they get married, and the government is "no different," you just made a great argument for the government staying out of things like regulating gay marriage.

Good job aCW, you finally made a good point.

Do I need to drop some acid or just put my mouth over a dope vaporizer for a few decades to follow your attempt at logic?

Quote:
Here's 3 articles from part 1 that explains it well.

And HERE IS AN ARTICLE for you that explains it well.

There's a huge difference between having a state church and having laws that come from the Bible.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
(Sigh, once a nutcase conspiracy theorist, always a nutcase conspiracy theorist).

*sigh* - once bought out and aligned with a satanic government,
always aligned and bought out by a satanic government.

The eugenicists and NWO bankers are not your friends.

They'll take your arms, and your country, and leave you
overrun by illegal immigrants.

America, the Great Experiment in Freemasonic 'Democracy', lasted barely 200 years.

On occasion you post some pretty informative information Naz. As for posts like this one:

Take a chill pill before you sit down a the keyboard and start typing.

 

[Eeset]

Take a chill pill before you sit down a the keyboard and start typing.

That's so gay.