it's good that you have Cruz pictured alongside all the "trannys" and lgbtq you show -atrol:
Rand is your Man
View attachment 19613
You mean that Rand Paul is the guy for Libertarians like you, WizardofOz (aka Captain Obvious, aka Aaron), Christian Liberty (aka the Jr. Libertarian), drbumley and TomO.
March 16, 2013
Bryan Fischer: Rand Paul's view of marriage would be a disaster for America
I think Rand Paul's position on marriage – getting government out of it altogether – is perfectly disastrous. The GOP must not go down this road.
Rand Paul does not strike me as a guy who changes his mind much, since he is a man of unbending principle. This is great when he's right and dangerous when he's wrong. He's just plain wrong on this. If he holds to this position, he must not become the GOP candidate in 2016.
Two concerns, among many:
His approach devalues the institution of marriage. It's just another agreement or contract, like the one Earl and Ray or Earlene and Raylene can get. There would be nothing special about marriage at all. This means, as we have seen in Scandinavian countries, that people stop getting married altogether. Children suffer. They grow up in unstable environments, with father or mother figures drifting in and out of their lives.
...The fatal weakness of libertarianism is that it inevitably and ineluctably deteriorates into license. That's not the America our Founders established. They predicated the entire American experiment on ordered liberty, the capacity of Americans to govern themselves according to the Ten Commandments of God.
Read more: http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/fischer/130316
Rand Paul on the shortlist for 2016 but not at the top
February 1, 2013
When Sen. Paul talks about a "libertarian-conservative" blend, and talks about the need for the GOP to "evolve" and "adapt" that understandably sends shivers down the spine of true conservatives who see conservatives principles as timeless, principles which do not stand in need of evolution or adaptation. They are fine just as they are, and need only to be articulated and implemented...
Last, Sen. Paul believes in amnesty. To be sure, he believes in amnesty only after Congress has voted for up to five consecutive years that the border is secure, based on reports from an independent inspector general, not administration lackeys. This makes his position far less objectionable than the one Sen. Rubio and the Amnesty Eight are flacking for.
But once Sen. Paul's threshold has been reached, he is apparently prepared to grant instant legalization to every illegal alien in the land.
This is a serious departure from the standard conservative principle of respect for and adherence to the rule of law. No responsible conservative immigration policy can grant such a massive waiver on such a fundamental principle. His view on this is libertarian, not conservative.
http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/fischer/130201
Rand Paul would Deny Minorities Equal Protection of the Law
Published on Wednesday, 08 April 2015 Written by Bryan Fischer
...But Rand Paul has an Achilles’ heel he does not even seem to be aware of. And that is, if his words are to be taken at face value, he would actively deprive blacks and other minorities of the equal protection of our laws.
Paul said yesterday that he is committed to “an America where criminal justice is applied equally and any law that disproportionately incarcerates people of color is repealed.
Repealed. Not retooled, recalibrated, but repealed. Since laws against murder, drug trafficking, robbery, and assault and battery disproportionately lock up blacks, Sen. Paul declared yesterday he’d repeal them all.
He would leave blacks and Hispanics defenseless against crimes committed against them by other minorities, thus depriving them of the equal and full protection of our laws.
Now this was the speech in which he introduced himself to the American people as a presidential candidate. It was a carefully crafted speech with every word and phrase quite deliberately chosen.
The senator has already tried to walk this statement back, claiming he was referring only to laws against non-violent crimes. But unfortunately, the senator said “any law,” and his statement reveals a deeply disturbing aspect of his view of justice from the man who wants to be our chief law enforcement officer.
The notion of “disparate impact,” which the senator has borrowed from Attorney General Eric Holder, is pernicious. It claims that if minorities are locked up for certain crimes at higher rates than white, this is proof of racism. This is patently ridiculous. If they are committing crimes at disproportionate rates, compared to whites, then they should be locked away at disproportionate rates.
Read more: http://www.rightsidenews.com/201504...-minorities-equal-protection-of-the-law.html#!
For people of faith and those who just plain believe in decency, Ted Cruz is your man, as he's unapologetic about defending Biblical principles.
Does Ted Cruz Really Think He Can Talk About a Gay ‘Jihad’ and Still be President?
http://www.mediaite.com/online/does...alk-about-a-gay-jihad-and-still-be-president/
