Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized! Part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Speaking of faggots that mock Jesus: It's time to share the Hunky Jesus Contest once again.


Jesus wasn't being mocked and I'm not gay, do you ever get things right aCW?

Of course you're not happy Al, it shows in the posts that you write.

Speaking of the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence:

Why is it that they (or any other homosexuals for that matter) never mock the false prophet Muhammad, I mean it's not like there isn't a ton of material to mock him with.

Muhammad_the_Pedophile_Aisha_8_vs_Muh_54.jpg


So what is it Al? Do the drag queens and their fellow LGBTQueers not like the idea of being beheaded for mocking the false prophet Muhammad or do you think it makes them uncomfortable to mock a false religion that they have so much in common with (HATRED of Judeo Christian doctrine and pedophilia/pederasty).
 

alwight

New member
So what is it Al? Do the drag queens and their fellow LGBTQueers not like the idea of being beheaded for mocking the false prophet Muhammad or do you think it makes them uncomfortable to mock a false religion that they have so much in common with (HATRED of Judeo Christian doctrine and pedophilia/pederasty).
Not being a drag queen I really don't know even if you do.
Perhaps you're sitting in drag at your computer right now for extra excitement for all I know.
Of course if you were brave you would come out and flaunt it, but on second thoughts aCW don't bother. :nono:
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
So what is it Al? Do the drag queens and their fellow LGBTQueers not like the idea of being beheaded for mocking the false prophet Muhammad or do you think it makes them uncomfortable to mock a false religion that they have so much in common with (HATRED of Judeo Christian doctrine and pedophilia/pederasty).


Not being a drag queen I really don't know even if you do.
Perhaps you're sitting in drag at your computer right now for extra excitement for all I know.
Of course if you were brave you would come out and flaunt it, but on second thoughts aCW don't bother. :nono:

While working on the table of contents I saw a couple of things worth mentioning here:

1) In the Koran, Allah doesn't denounce homosexuality.

2). When talking about (the false relgion of) Islam, alwight the atheist implies that perhaps that's a religion he could follow.

And who says the table of contents isn't worthwhile?
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
In "Just say NO! to homosexuality AND Barry Manilow's plastic surgeon" news:

Barry Manilow secretly wed longtime manager Garry Kief last year: report

April 9, 2015

Barry Manilow is a married man-dy!

The pop icon quietly tied the knot with longtime manager Garry Kief in a small private ceremony in 2014, according to The National Enquirer, which first reported the story.

The pair exchanged vows at Manilow’s home in Palm Springs, Calif., an insider told the publication.

“It was a surprise,” the couple’s friend said, adding that the “20 to 30 guests” invited to the “Copacabana” singer’s home thought they were attending a lunch.

While the pair is said to have not filed any official paperwork, Manilow, 71, and Kief, 66, reportedly exchanged wedding bands as a signal of their dedication.

“(They) are committed to one another and have been for a very long time,” another source told People magazine. “They have a great relationship. Garry has always been there for Barry.”

Longtime friend and neighbor Suzanne Somers acted as the best man and Marc Hulett, Barry’s assistant since the 1980s, performed the “commitment ceremony” after registering online to become a minister, according to the Enquirer.

A source told People that while the news Manilow was marrying a man may be surprising to some people, he has never hidden his sexual orientation.


Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/entertai...tly-wed-manager-2014-report-article-1.2178211

Barry-Manilow1370397061.jpg
 

Jedidiah

New member
This thread involves a tad bit more than just believing in God's Word, it involves action.
We know that what our civil government calls "marriage" is not necessarily marriage as the Church knows marriage, but is only a legal relationship governed by a contract, and that contract is enforced by our civil government. That any man is "married" to another man doesn't make it so. They've entered into a contractual relationship with one another, like how business partners do the same thing. Contracts can be dissolved, but as you know, God said, about real marriage, "...they twain shall be one flesh: so then they are no more twain, but one flesh," and then to clarify Himself He adds, "Whosoever shall put away his wife, and marry another, committeth adultery against her. 12 And if a woman shall put away her husband, and be married to another, she committeth adultery." The first (valid) marriage is permanent (in this world which is passing away), which means that all subsequent "marriages" are no more valid than Manilow's "marriage" to his "spouse." Yet because we've conflated contractual "marriage" with actual marriage, and put our civil blessing on re-marriage after divorce, we act as if everything's hunky-dory even though some of our neighbors are living in a state of constant and unending adultery.
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
This thread involves a tad bit more than just believing in God's Word, it involves action.


We know that what our civil government calls "marriage" is not necessarily marriage as the Church knows marriage, but is only a legal relationship governed by a contract, and that contract is enforced by our civil government. That any man is "married" to another man doesn't make it so. They've entered into a contractual relationship with one another, like how business partners do the same thing. Contracts can be dissolved, but as you know, God said, about real marriage, "...they twain shall be one flesh: so then they are no more twain, but one flesh," and then to clarify Himself He adds, "Whosoever shall put away his wife, and marry another, committeth adultery against her. 12 And if a woman shall put away her husband, and be married to another, she committeth adultery." The first (valid) marriage is permanent (in this world which is passing away), which means that all subsequent "marriages" are no more valid than Manilow's "marriage" to his "spouse." Yet because we've conflated contractual "marriage" with actual marriage, and put our civil blessing on re-marriage after divorce, we act as if everything's hunky-dory even though some of our neighbors are living in a state of constant and unending adultery.

So you would be ok if civil government allowed Manilow and what'shisname to have a "civil union" (giving them certain rights, kinda like business partners do, but with deviant disease ridden sex involved), as long as they didn't call it marriage?
 

Jedidiah

New member
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
This thread involves a tad bit more than just believing in God's Word, it involves action.




So you would be ok if civil government allowed Manilow and what'shisname to have a "civil union" (giving them certain rights, kinda like business partners do, but with deviant disease ridden sex involved), as long as they didn't call it marriage?
No, they can call it "marriage" if they want to. I'll fight to keep a straight face, and to keep my hands from making air quotes. It's not real. It's like they're at a costume party and they get to "be" who they dress up as. "We're dressed up as married people, yay!"

What do you think about condoning perpetual, repeated adultery by permitting remarriage after divorce though ? There's got to be tens of millions of "marriages" like this. "Oh good, now we can openly commit adultery in peace."

Neither of them are real.
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
So you would be ok if civil government allowed Manilow and what'shisname to have a "civil union" (giving them certain rights, kinda like business partners do, but with deviant disease ridden sex involved), as long as they didn't call it marriage?

No, they can call it "marriage" if they want to. I'll fight to keep a straight face, and to keep my hands from making air quotes. It's not real. It's like they're at a costume party and they get to "be" who they dress up as. "We're dressed up as married people, yay!"

So you're ok with civil government giving those who engage in a sexual behavior that God detests certain rights?

What do you think about condoning perpetual, repeated adultery by permitting remarriage after divorce though ? There's got to be tens of millions of "marriages" like this. "Oh good, now we can openly commit adultery in peace."

Neither of them are real.

There are legitimate grounds for divorce and remarriage in the Bible. Check your's to see if it ever legitimizes homosexuality.

As I've mentioned numerous times throughout this 3 part thread: No-fault divorce legislation has been devastating on the family and needs to be changed.

That being said: Surely you're not comparing someone who marries, divorces and then remarries with someone who is a sexual deviant are you Jed?
 

TracerBullet

New member
In "Just say NO! to homosexuality AND Barry Manilow's plastic surgeon" news:

Barry Manilow secretly wed longtime manager Garry Kief last year: report

April 9, 2015

Barry Manilow is a married man-dy!

The pop icon quietly tied the knot with longtime manager Garry Kief in a small private ceremony in 2014, according to The National Enquirer, which first reported the story.

The pair exchanged vows at Manilow’s home in Palm Springs, Calif., an insider told the publication.

“It was a surprise,” the couple’s friend said, adding that the “20 to 30 guests” invited to the “Copacabana” singer’s home thought they were attending a lunch.

While the pair is said to have not filed any official paperwork, Manilow, 71, and Kief, 66, reportedly exchanged wedding bands as a signal of their dedication.

“(They) are committed to one another and have been for a very long time,” another source told People magazine. “They have a great relationship. Garry has always been there for Barry.”

Longtime friend and neighbor Suzanne Somers acted as the best man and Marc Hulett, Barry’s assistant since the 1980s, performed the “commitment ceremony” after registering online to become a minister, according to the Enquirer.

A source told People that while the news Manilow was marrying a man may be surprising to some people, he has never hidden his sexual orientation.


Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/entertai...tly-wed-manager-2014-report-article-1.2178211

Barry-Manilow1370397061.jpg

He can't be gay. He's so much older than 42 years old
 

TracerBullet

New member
We know that what our civil government calls "marriage" is not necessarily marriage as the Church knows marriage, but is only a legal relationship governed by a contract, and that contract is enforced by our civil government. That any man is "married" to another man doesn't make it so. They've entered into a contractual relationship with one another, like how business partners do the same thing. Contracts can be dissolved, but as you know, God said, about real marriage, "...they twain shall be one flesh: so then they are no more twain, but one flesh," and then to clarify Himself He adds, "Whosoever shall put away his wife, and marry another, committeth adultery against her. 12 And if a woman shall put away her husband, and be married to another, she committeth adultery." The first (valid) marriage is permanent (in this world which is passing away), which means that all subsequent "marriages" are no more valid than Manilow's "marriage" to his "spouse." Yet because we've conflated contractual "marriage" with actual marriage, and put our civil blessing on re-marriage after divorce, we act as if everything's hunky-dory even though some of our neighbors are living in a state of constant and unending adultery.


Marriage is marriage, deal with it
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
And who says the table of contents isn't worthwhile?

Who would dare to suggest such a thing?!

:shocked:

Pay no heed to such disparagement aCW! Your TOC is always a gladly received contribution and no mistake! (Well okay, there's several mistakes within and it's pretty much a load of crap but keep it coming)

:thumb:
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
He [Barry Manilow, the guy with the scary plastic face] can't be gay. He's so much older than 42 years old

Manilow has obviously been a very good boy when it comes to taking his AIDS cocktail medication.

ap_rm_photo_of_AIDS_patient_sorting_medicine.jpg

(Manilow in his redneck days, before the horrendous plastic surgery job on his face).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top