WizOz - you asked what I thought, not how I thought a court would act. I'm no lawyer, and I'm unfamiliar with the specifics of the events you raised. I am not a member of the groups you refer to. What was you point in asking me?
So;
This thread is for Christians to whine about Atheists?
Where does it say that anyone was Atheist?
It's not always "whiny atheists", other religions will whine about other religions
Your post entailed such language; "Sounds like the school was violating the establishment clause in supporting an evangelical christian organisation. Don't they know the rules?" "Gov't property: they should know better." "Broke equality laws"
I understand that you're not a lawyer not as member of these groups and neither am I, but here is a chance to become familiar with the specifics of the events raised.
After all, it's just a discussion thread
So;
This thread is for Christians to whine about Atheists?
Is this a post by an atheist whining about Christians whining about atheists whining about Christians?
When will the madness stop?
:chuckle: Sure, why not....
Why is it a safe assumption?Probably a safe assumption but alwight did note this in the WTC case:
We still need to straighten out this cake thing.I shall amend the thread title to read "Whiny Atheists Et Al"
No, I was asking.Is this a post by an atheist whining about Christians whining about atheists whining about Christians?
Are you whining about the madness?
It was in whiny tone.He was asking.
I think whining about other groups will always be a natural human trait, it's good to whine.I shall amend the thread title to read "Whiny Atheists Et Al"
I think whining about other groups will always be a natural human trait, it's good to whine.
During a war we will put aside our local differences to face a common enemy, which is what despots and tyrants understand rather well, and maybe a reason why there even are major wars.
So imo whining is good, keep on whining.
Whining about cake each day will keep Hitler away.About cake?
So;
You're doing what you're complaining about?
Why is it a safe assumption?
It would be jut as safe an assumption that the gays were Christian would it not? Statistically?
They were making a big deal about a wedding after all.
When Atheists get married they usually just drink until they pass out then the bridesmaid and best man burn a DNA helix onto the sole of their left foot.
No cake.
Or maybe that's Wicca.
We still need to straighten out this cake thing.
Military Religious Freedom Foundation whined about the Air Force cadet oath so the Air Force Academy announced that it will now be optional for cadets to recite “so help me God” at the end of its honor oath.
American Atheists still whine because they feel it doesn't go far enough and that "the Air Force Academy should take out the “god” part altogether."
James 5:12: Above all, my brothers and sisters, do not swear—not by heaven or by earth or by anything else. All you need to say is a simple “Yes” or “No.” Otherwise you will be condemned.
(from your second link)
Seems like the bible says swearing an oath is a bad thing.
Only a small percentage of people would refuse to sell someone a cake.A percentage of Christians are homosexual, I'm sure. But undoubtedly only a very small percentage would sue a Christian baker who refuses to bake a same-sex wedding cake. I'm playing the odds on this one.
So it's not even a wedding cake?!?!?!The wedding was long over before the cake incident arose.