glorydaz
Well-known member
For the unbeliever, it is true. That's my best guess.
The preaching of the cross is the power of God unto salvation. 1 Corinthians 1:18
That includes the entire work of the cross, not just the resurrection.
For the unbeliever, it is true. That's my best guess.
Pornography is grave matter, even if you don't lust after the people. You can't condemn pornography in itself, but only pornography with lusting, based strictly on the Scripture. This doesn't accord with what is commonly known to be true, that pornography is wrong in itself, so that the Bible would permit pornography without lust, is wrong, and the Lord's own solution for this chink is His bishops' authorized teaching on the moral matter of pornography. It is wrong; it is wrongdoing, the production, distribution, promotion, and consumption of pornography is wrong, and gravely so, regardless of whether you lust or not, during any or no part of it.Of course there is. Thou shalt not kill, and thou shalt not commit adultery. If you look at a woman with lust you've committed adultery with her in your heart.
It's all there in the Bible. If it's not, it's of man, and not God.
Of course men are fallible. But Christ isn't. And Christ built the Church. He instituted the college of bishops, seeding it with His Twelve Apostles. It is through these men, through their successors, that He speaks to us today.
No. You have to root this in Scripture, as a Protestant. And you can't, is what I'm telling you. And that's part of why I'm Catholic in my theology.What's to extrapolate? No one needs to be told those are wrong. Our God given conscience tells us that.
Pornography is grave matter, even if you don't lust after the people. You can't condemn pornography in itself, but only pornography with lusting, based strictly on the Scripture. This doesn't accord with what is commonly known to be true, that pornography is wrong in itself, so that the Bible would permit pornography without lust, is wrong, and the Lord's own solution for this chink is His bishops' authorized teaching on the moral matter of pornography. It is wrong; it is wrongdoing, the production, distribution, promotion, and consumption of pornography is wrong, and gravely so, regardless of whether you lust or not, during any or no part of it.
No. You have to root this in Scripture, as a Protestant. And you can't, is what I'm telling you. And that's part of why I'm Catholic in my theology.
Pornography is grave matter, even if you don't lust after the people. You can't condemn pornography in itself, but only pornography with lusting, based strictly on the Scripture. This doesn't accord with what is commonly known to be true, that pornography is wrong in itself, so that the Bible would permit pornography without lust, is wrong, and the Lord's own solution for this chink is His bishops' authorized teaching on the moral matter of pornography. It is wrong; it is wrongdoing, the production, distribution, promotion, and consumption of pornography is wrong, and gravely so, regardless of whether you lust or not, during any or no part of it.
There are only about 5,000 Catholic bishops. There are reportedly about a billion Catholics. That's 200,000-to-1. That's way too small a ratio, that's why there are so many priests, to deal with all those Catholics, because there's not enough bishops. Bishops, overseers, elders, these are the men in Scripture ordained by the imposition of the Apostles' hands, and who then ordained others in the same way, which is the physical succession of the Apostles to this day. 200,000 Catholics is probably about the population of the archdiocese within which I live. The archbishop is the senior pastor of this archdiocese, and there are many dozens of parish churches who are all in the archdiocese. Timothy was a bishop, and Titus was a bishop, and Peter and Paul addressed these men directly in multiple places in the Scripture.That's the biggest fault with Catholics. They turn against other believers to follow their "religion". :nono:
No. You have to root this in Scripture, as a Protestant. And you can't, is what I'm telling you. And that's part of why I'm Catholic in my theology.
There is succession of bishops. You contend it's illegitimate, but that's another thing. These Christians, Catholics and the Orthodox, believe that bishops are physically an extension of the Apostles, and therefore of the Lord Himself, because of the unending chain of the imposition of hands consecrating a bishop. Every bishop is ordained because an Apostle ordained a bishop who ordained a bishop who ordained a bishop etc., who ordained him.There is no succession of bishops.
There are only about 5,000 Catholic bishops. There are reportedly about a billion Catholics. That's 200,000-to-1. That's way too small a ratio, that's why there are so many priests, to deal with all those Catholics, because there's not enough bishops. Bishops, overseers, elders, these are the men in Scripture ordained by the imposition of the Apostles' hands, and who then ordained others in the same way, which is the physical succession of the Apostles to this day. 200,000 Catholics is probably about the population of the archdiocese within which I live. The archbishop is the senior pastor of this archdiocese, and there are many dozens of parish churches who are all in the archdiocese. Timothy was a bishop, and Titus was a bishop, and Peter and Paul addressed these men directly in multiple places in the Scripture.
What if someone doesn't sin? Quote-unquote.The preaching of the cross is the power of God unto salvation. 1 Corinthians 1:18
That includes the entire work of the cross, not just the resurrection.
He speaks through the magisterium even if they don't believe in Him.You mean Christ speaks through true Christians (if not speaking directly).
The intention foresees the consumption, and consumption doesn't require lust, is what I'm saying. Scripture doesn't talk about pornography without lusting, is my point.Obviously - if images are made with the intention of making money through sexual desire then it would be wrong and covered by scripture.
Catholicism's rooted in Scripture. It's not a problem.That would be a problem for all Christians...if it is a problem.
There is succession of bishops. You contend it's illegitimate, but that's another thing. These Christians, Catholics and the Orthodox, believe that bishops are physically an extension of the Apostles, and therefore of the Lord Himself, because of the unending chain of the imposition of hands consecrating a bishop. Every bishop is ordained because an Apostle ordained a bishop who ordained a bishop who ordained a bishop etc., who ordained him.
The intention foresees the consumption, and consumption doesn't require lust, is what I'm saying. Scripture doesn't talk about pornography without lusting, is my point.
Catholicism's rooted in Scripture. It's not a problem.
There is succession of bishops. You contend it's illegitimate, but that's another thing. These Christians, Catholics and the Orthodox, believe that bishops are physically an extension of the Apostles, and therefore of the Lord Himself, because of the unending chain of the imposition of hands consecrating a bishop. Every bishop is ordained because an Apostle ordained a bishop who ordained a bishop who ordained a bishop etc., who ordained him.
Participating in the production, distribution, promotion, and consumption of pornography does not require lust, coveting, greed, or adultery, is my point. Meanwhile, in the teachers edition to the Catholic faith, it calls out pornography by name, eliminating even the possibility of this conversation we're having, which, I know, I started it, but why is this conversation possible? I say, because we're supposed to be Catholic. 'Same thing with those Trinity threads, this isn't supposed to be happening.There is nothing that Scripture doesn't cover, because there is nothing new under the sun.
There are some who say art is pornography. There are some who covet another man's wife even when she is fully clothed. Lust, coveting, greed, and adultery...these all address any type of sexual sins. Mankind was created to know good and evil...thus he has no excuse.