PureX
Well-known member
I am not an 'absolutist'. I do not experience life in terms of binary absolutes that are 'all this' or 'all that'. Everything is a part of everything else in the world and in myself, as I experience it. So if you are seeking binary absolutes, here, I can't give you any.So I find it fascinating that forgiveness seems at the moment to be nothing like a form of love, as I at first thought it must be. If true, it helps a great deal in figuring out the true meaning of forgiveness. For we would then be able to rule out every scripture about love as speaking of something other than forgiving.
Is everyone pretty much in agreement that forgiving is never loving and forgiveness cannot possibly be love?
Is a spiritual state the same as a choice? If not, then please forgive me for misunderstanding you earlier. For it now seems clear you are saying forgiveness is not at all a kind of love.
Love and forgiveness are not the same things. If they were, we wouldn't have applied different terms to them. Yet I think they are intrinsically related to each other as phenomena. Likewise, choice and action are not the same things, yet they, too, are intrinsically related to each other as phenomena. So the question we need to answer is; 'how are they intrinsically related'? And for me, the answers lay in seeing both love and forgiveness, choice and action as a process, expressed: a way of being. A way of being that begins with making the choice to be (loving, forgiving, kind, generous, etc.) and results, eventually, in having become those things both within our own hearts and minds, and outwardly, to others.
Exactly.I'm thinking we can choose to adopt a state, but that choice to become is not the same as being. Also the state I'm in might influence my choices, but the choices they influence are not the same as the state that influences them. So yes, I'm sure you must be of the opinion that forgiveness is in no way love, though it might be a cause or consequence of love.