SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
Like I said - oversimplification.
Nah.
Like I said - oversimplification.
Your SECOND time to make this baseless accusation WITHOUT an explanation as to WHY it's so!Like I said - oversimplification.
The very origin of ALL off-based conclusions.
Ignore it; but that is what that is - oversimplification
The best towards you, nonetheless, my fellow Mid-Actser...
You just aren't reading that right, RD, STP. You two need a guru to 'splain it.
Luckily I know of a guy...
2 + 2 = 4.
Sorry, that is oversimplification.
and 2 x 2 = 4, as well, 2^2 = 4 and log-base 2 always doubles, so log2^2 =4, but log2^20 is much greater than 400, tee hee hee.:crackup:
This is when they could all speak boolaboola and each of them taught one in return. This is where log2 came in.Two types of Gentiles in this chapter. One Paul spent much time with and knew them well.
Others Paul did not know. Now, examine his letter to the Ephesians carefully. Notice the we who he knew and the ye that he had only heard of their faith. Then notice the us.
Acts 19
King James Version (KJV)
5 When they heard this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.
6 And when Paul had laid his hands upon them, the Holy Ghost came on them; and they spake with tongues, and prophesied.
Your SECOND time to make this baseless accusation WITHOUT an explanation as to WHY it's so!
Shame on you. Put up or shut up.
Shame on you.You'll have to try that shame nonsense on someone else.
I brought these issues up on the MAD forum to no avail.
Why?
Because you and yours fail to see that there is a huge difference between the simplicity that MAD is based on and the oversimplification these ideas some MADs assert, are based on.
Further, with the exception of STP you and yours right off go into guilt trip attempts and what not, whenever these issues are brought up.
I joke about it here and there because it is not my view.
These people here...
Romans 1:7 To all that be in Rome, beloved of God, called to be saints: Grace to you and peace from God our Father, and the Lord Jesus Christ. 1:8 First, I thank my God through Jesus Christ for you all, that your faith is spoken of throughout the whole world.
And here...
Romans 6:1 What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound? 6:2 God forbid. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein? 6:3 Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death? 6:4 Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life.
6:14 For sin shall not have dominion over you: for ye are not under the law, but under grace.
6:17 But God be thanked, that ye were the servants of sin, but ye have obeyed from the heart that form of doctrine which was delivered you. 6:18 Being then made free from sin, ye became the servants of righteousness.
And much more on them throughout Romans makes it obvious they are not these people here:
Romans 2:17 Behold, thou art called a Jew, and restest in the law, and makest thy boast of God, 2:18 And knowest his will, and approvest the things that are more excellent, being instructed out of the law; 2:19 And art confident that thou thyself art a guide of the blind, a light of them which are in darkness, 2:20 An instructor of the foolish, a teacher of babes, which hast the form of knowledge and of the truth in the law. 2:21 Thou therefore which teachest another, teachest thou not thyself? thou that preachest a man should not steal, dost thou steal? 2:22 Thou that sayest a man should not commit adultery, dost thou commit adultery? thou that abhorrest idols, dost thou commit sacrilege? 2:23 Thou that makest thy boast of the law, through breaking the law dishonourest thou God? 2:24 For the name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles through you, as it is written.
Yours is an oversimplification of the word "called" in the Rom. 2:17's phrase "thou art called a Jew."
Again, try that shame nonsense on someone else - you and your very very small camp on these issues (within MAD in general) are no more the be all end all on any issue than I am :chuckle:
2 + 2 = 4.
Sorry, that is oversimplification.
you and your very very small camp on these issues (within MAD in general)
Next time, just reply to the person that you're accusing and EXPLAIN what you think the problem is; instead of your "drive by" insults.
Shame on you.
Next time, just reply to the person that you're accusing and EXPLAIN what you think the problem is; instead of your "drive by" insults.
Reminds me of Pepe.
:think:
Nah. Couldn't be.
Why, that's not ungracious, dismissive and authoritative at all. No siree, not at all.
Good example of misinterpreting another's words based on an oversimplification.
Thanks for that fine example of my very point, bro
You just aren't reading that right, RD, STP. You two need a guru to 'splain it.
Luckily I know of a guy...
I would say that, in this case, it is you that simply ignores details and then claims that others are "over complicating".Now you're being duplicitous.
STP often posts a :chuckle: to those posts of others he disagrees with on some point.
I have always seen that as his sense of humor.
Out of my own sense of that when I often joke and or post a :chuckle:
Some of you MADs are simply an intolerant bunch :chuckle:
And :crackup:
Words mean things. You chose your words. Choose them more carefully if you don't want to be misunderstood.