...A man is innocent or guilty regardless of what you say should be the case.
It's a matter of what is true at law. What lawyers and judges and juries accomplish through process is determining whether someone believed to be guilty (by the prosecutor/police) but presumed innocent actually is.
Nothing I've said requires anything other than plain ol' common sense.
I don't even think much of what you've said requires that.
lain:
In fact, it seems quite an advantage to have not wasted time on any degrees.
I bet you won't simply pull a guy off the street if your gallbladder ruptures and you shouldn't if you're sued.
...Kermit's lawyer was required to defend a murderer.
No, he isn't. He doesn't have to take the appeal. And his client wasn't a murderer until adjudicated so. But even murderers have rights in our country, including the right to appeal the judgement that named them.
I don't respect your just-a-system and nothing I've said is incorrect.
In order, I don't care and you just said something else that's incorrect.