genuineoriginal
New member
Isn't autocorrect wonderful?
Top physicist on climate change....
- Thread starter Nathon Detroit
- Start date
You're right, theology uses empirical evidence and science uses rationalism.
Quetzal
New member
genuineoriginal
New member
My wife has gone through the conventional treatments for cancer, and we no longer trust the consensus opinion.
Next time we will use one of the options from the dissenters.
_____
Cancer is curable NOW! Thirty experts reveal most advanced and effective cancer treatments and cures available today
CANCER is Curable NOW shows how alternative cancer treatment has grown into a commanding movement that's gathering power and momentum, growing much faster than almost anyone anticipated. An ever-growing number of talented people are involved in this rapidly occurring shift of consciousness, and by viewing this video, you can tune in to the latest groundbreaking therapies that are reversing cancers in people across the world right now.
More and more patients are simply turning to the doctors and treatments that work rather than wasting their time with toxic conventional treatments that only harm them. CANCER is Curable NOW advises viewers to vote with their money and take their business to those who promote HEALING rather than toxic treatments.
_____
Cancer is curable NOW! Thirty experts reveal most advanced and effective cancer treatments and cures available today
CANCER is Curable NOW shows how alternative cancer treatment has grown into a commanding movement that's gathering power and momentum, growing much faster than almost anyone anticipated. An ever-growing number of talented people are involved in this rapidly occurring shift of consciousness, and by viewing this video, you can tune in to the latest groundbreaking therapies that are reversing cancers in people across the world right now.
More and more patients are simply turning to the doctors and treatments that work rather than wasting their time with toxic conventional treatments that only harm them. CANCER is Curable NOW advises viewers to vote with their money and take their business to those who promote HEALING rather than toxic treatments.
_____
Yep
Yale University has shown that those who deny AGW no more about the subject than those who adhere to it:
A new study by Yale University Professor Dan Kahan confirmed that skeptics of the controversial anthropogenic global-warming theory — or realists, as they often call themselves — know more about climate science than AGW theorists.
genuineoriginal
New member
The data has been altered to support their conclusions.
:duh:
The IPCC does not have any data to show that limiting the burning of fossil fuels will make any change on the climate.
If they had not attempted to force their opinion (that people should stop using cheap reliable energy sources) on the public using their altered data, their fraud would never have been exposed.
They got greedy.
Another study by Nature.com shows that the more scientifically knowledgeable a person is, the less likely he or she is to be alarmed by AGW.
The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks
The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks
Quetzal
New member
You can't prove that.
Liar! They publish papers, graphs, and data sets all the time that say exactly that. I will link one as an example:
I know how to use the Bible
(Romans 1:20) For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.
The Bible makes it clear that you can't look around and see what God has made and still deny that there is a God.
Therefore, you suppress the truth for your own wicked desires. You are without excuse.
The IPCC also said there would be less snow because of milder winters due to global warming.
Then when that didn't happen, they now say there will be more snow because of global warming.
I can't believe people like you keep listening to a group of people (IPCC) that has been wrong over and over and over again.
“Milder winter temperatures will decrease heavy snowstorms but could cause an increase in freezing rain if average daily temperatures fluctuate about the freezing point.” -IPCC, Climate Change, 2001
“The lowest winter temperatures are likely to increase more than average winter temperature in northern Europe. …The duration of the snow season is very likely to shorten in all of Europe, and snow depth is likely to decrease in at least most of Europe.” - IPCC, Climate Change, 2007
Just how many times does the IPCC have to keep being wrong before you finally get that you have been dooped?
genuineoriginal
New member
It has already been proven.
:duh:
_____
NOAA/NASA Dramatically Altered US Temperatures After The Year 2000
Prior to the year 2000, NASA showed US temperatures cooling since the 1930’s, and 1934 much warmer than 1998.
. . .
Right after the year 2000, NASA and NOAA dramatically altered US climate history, making the past much colder and the present much warmer. The animation below shows how NASA cooled 1934 and warmed 1998, to make 1998 the hottest year in US history instead of 1934. This alteration turned a long term cooling trend since 1930 into a warming trend.
_____
NOAA/NASA Dramatically Altered US Temperatures After The Year 2000
Prior to the year 2000, NASA showed US temperatures cooling since the 1930’s, and 1934 much warmer than 1998.
. . .
Right after the year 2000, NASA and NOAA dramatically altered US climate history, making the past much colder and the present much warmer. The animation below shows how NASA cooled 1934 and warmed 1998, to make 1998 the hottest year in US history instead of 1934. This alteration turned a long term cooling trend since 1930 into a warming trend.
_____
Quetzal
New member
You made a claim about the IPCC that was incorrect. Strawmen aside, you do not know what you are talking about.
Quetzal
New member
A wordpress blog? Going to have to do a lot better than that. I can make a wordpress blog, doctor a table, and provide it as evidence, too.It has already been proven.
:duh:
_____
NOAA/NASA Dramatically Altered US Temperatures After The Year 2000
Prior to the year 2000, NASA showed US temperatures cooling since the 1930’s, and 1934 much warmer than 1998.
. . .
Right after the year 2000, NASA and NOAA dramatically altered US climate history, making the past much colder and the present much warmer. The animation below shows how NASA cooled 1934 and warmed 1998, to make 1998 the hottest year in US history instead of 1934. This alteration turned a long term cooling trend since 1930 into a warming trend.
_____
“He who controls the past controls the future. He who controls the present controls the past.” - George Orwell
genuineoriginal
New member
Just like the IPCC did in their "official" reports?
NOAA admits to changing the temperature of 1934. The graphs are real.
Here is what they say:
To that end, U.S. HCN temperature records have been “corrected” to account for various historical changes in station location, instrumentation, and observing practice.
See HERE
Please explain how a wooden ship was able to navigate the Northwest Passage in 1903?
Quetzal
New member
Tell you what. When you can find a blog from a reputable climatologist that has sources, references, and data sets from reputable sources that counters the current theories held by the IPCC, we will talk. Until then... :wave2:
Quetzal
New member
So what about the data from 1940 on? Again, same thing I said to genuine applies to you. :wave2: