Samstarrett
New member
Yes his ministered to women as well as men.
Absolutely true. And we should do that. And there is a place for women in ministering to women, too. But women should not be the leaders of church bodies.
It would just surprise me if Christ (who openly treated women as equals in a day when that was not the norm, was probably cared for on the road by women, and appeared to them first after his death) was not okay with women being leaders of his Church.
It may surprise you, but that is what Paul said. Besides, it'll take a little more convincing on your part to get me to think Christ treated women as 'equal' in the sense of having the same role. He certainly treated them as precious and beloved in the sight of God, which they are, but I don't believe He ever taught that they were to take over all traditionally male roles, though, of course, the culture of the time had probably gone too far in the opposite direction, which He would also oppose.
The first Christians were taken care of by spiritually active women - they would meet in their houses to worship. Paul mentions several women who were active in the church: Priscilla and Aquila (Acts 18:26, Romans 16:3), Mary (Romans 16:6), Julia and Nereus's sister (Romans 16:15) and others.
I'm not against women being active in the church; as I said above, I even think there's a place for them in the ministry.
I am not saying that we should just cast tradition aside. I do think that is prudent to occasionally reevaluate and perhaps revise tradition.
Yes, but only with the utmost caution. And if our age has a persistent error, it is not that we cling too tightly to tradition.