Nang
TOL Subscriber
Then how did man manage to usurp the Sovereign will of God to begin with? :liberals:
Man has not usurped the sovereign will of God at all.
Nang
Then how did man manage to usurp the Sovereign will of God to begin with? :liberals:
Man has not usurped the sovereign will of God at all.
Nang
So God decreed that 'innocent and upright' man wouldn't display faith in His word then? :liberals:
Here is the Reformed view of "Reprobation" (i.e. many souls are consigned by God Almighty God to hell for sin):
Reprobation is not the cause of unbelief.
Reprobation is not because of unbelief.
God accomplishes sovereignly His eternal decree of reprobation IN THE WAY OF UNBELIEF.
In this way, God's sovereignty is maintained and man's accountability is preserved.
Do not reply to this post within ten seconds, ten minutes, or even ten days.
Think about the above statements for awhile . . .
Reflect on this explanation of the doctrine of Reprobation for a decent period of time before you either reply in agreement with this position as being totally Scriptural and sound, or reject this explanation as being unbiblical and therefore wrong.
Nang
Then how did man manage to usurp the Sovereign will of God to begin with? :liberals:
"Faith" is not an innate attribute of created beings.
Faith in the Word of God comes only by being spiritually born of the One faithful Son of God, Jesus Christ.
Nang
I will very much agree with you on this one. Man's track record, including my own, shows the ability to rebel against him. With great consistency.
So God decreed that 'innocent and upright' man wouldn't display faith in His word then? :liberals:
Well then, why describe the original state of created man as 'innocent and upright' then? If that were the case then the only deviation would be either decreed by God or against the Will of God.
You're contradicting yourself.
Yes.
God decreed salvation would be realized through unbelief, so that all salvation would be a matter of grace . . . and not a matter of finding righteousness by man trying or achieving to be like God under the Law.
Comprehende?
The original state of created man was innocent and upright.
However, this innocent and upright man failed to display faith in the word and promises of God.
Think longer about that.
Nang
NO.The TheologyOnline.com TOPIC OF THE DAY for July 12th, 2011 08:59 AM
toldailytopic: The reprobate. Are some people born with no hope of salvation?
Take the topic above and run with it! Slice it, dice it, give us your general thoughts about it. Everyday there will be a new TOL Topic of the Day.
If you want to make suggestions for the Topic of the Day send a Tweet to @toldailytopic or @theologyonline or send it to us via Facebook.
No, I do not contradict myself.
Being created as innocent and upright flesh does not compare to being born again, and being found spiritually faithful.
The first Adam, made of dust does not compare with the last Adam, Jesus Christ, in whom all righteousness and perfect faithfulness is found.
Then you're still contradicting yourself by initially maintaining that original created man was 'innocent and upright'. He obviously wasn't by this reasoning. He was flawed, and it was by God's design.
So innocent and upright people are predestined to hell then?
You are assuming that being created in a state of innocence is equivalent to being morally perfect like God.
Adam, made of dust, was never morally equivalent to his Maker.
What innocent and upright people do you refer to?
There is no such thing, since the fall of Adam.
That is not what I am talking about and I would expect you to know it.
You also said created 'upright', so how did the innocence and the latter disappear if not by the Sovereign Will of God? It's a complete dichotomy Nang.
I didn't. You did and you should have thought better of it. Even Adam wasn't innocent and upright as you claim else he wouldn't have fallen would he? :squint: