WizardofOz
New member
Not being equal does not mean one has more vaule than the other.
:rotfl:
It doesn't? If two things have the same value, is their value equal or unequal? This is math 101, Nick M.
Not being equal does not mean one has more vaule than the other.
Murdering catholic priests by the thousand, Jews by the millions isn't how the Nazi's define themselves. And you ignore how right wingers define themselves and put on your own label. So why are you concerned with what image they want to portray?
But lets play along. You hav ovaries and are equal to a woman? :mock: granite
Not being equal does not mean one has more vaule than the other.
Well if we define "feminism" as an attempt to maintain and achieve gender equality, I can't see how anyone in their right mind would necessarily oppose it.
Actually, it is the lesbos and zealots that are the push, not just a small exception.
Partly true. You want a job go get one. A man that stays at home and doesn't provide is a godless wuss and needs to put on his man pants. You got that part wrong.
Then why are the feminist leaders so entrenched in another womans "choice"?
:rotfl:
It doesn't? If two things have the same value, is their value equal or unequal? This is math 101, Nick M.
And having the democrat call the republican a "whore" and is backing up that statement still, and absolutely no woman feminist has come to the aid proves it has nothing to do with the treatment of women, chyrsostom is right for once.
"Wimmensfolks" however, isn't a word.
Hey!! Cowboys are people too. :readthis:
Well if we define "feminism" as an attempt to maintain and achieve gender equality, I can't see how anyone in their right mind would necessarily oppose it.
Since when was there equality?
Probably not, but I'll bet you've heard of BET.
I'd be acused of all sorts of hateful things.
Hey!! Cowboys are people too. :readthis:
Since Cain shared his veggies with Abel and they lived happily ever after.:crackup:
Are you a member of a minority, Vegas?
Or are you one of those white heterosexual American dudes who feels like he is? Serious question.
I'd ask why you felt there was a need, considering the predominance of programming and overall entertainment that panders to and seeks to attract a largely white audience. What exactly is the problem?
In what respect? Under the law? It's iffy, though the idea was in play with our founding. Unfortunately, getting from there to the practical, day in and out variety has been a work in progress.Since when was there equality?
Sure....I'll bet you've heard of BET.
Sure, though we mostly call it EVERY OTHER NETWORK. :chuckle:Ever heard of WET (White Entertainment Television)?
You'd end up with a large number of angry, disappointed, teen age boys flooding your switchboard with complaints. Also, I'd imagine, a few t-shirt companies.What would happen today if I started WET?
Kids. Go figure. The problem with your foundation is the need to identify for the majority, who control the majority of what is consumed by virtue of their status. Given that redundancy people would rather naturally suspect something else was in play. When the majority behaves like a minority it's usually at the extremes--say, the Klan or the WWF. lain:I'd be acused of all sorts of hateful things.
He can have that effect on a person if they aren't careful.I see your point, though...sorry, not meaning to give you a hard time...your comment just made me think of that.
*John Wayne Swagger* "A man's gotta do what a man's gotta do"
*John Wayne Swagger finished*
Did it ever occur to you that I can intentionally avoid that?Do you think there is a chance that if/when you get married that your wife could possibly be making more than you?
Did it ever occur to you that I can intentionally avoid that?
I would avoid getting married before I can provide for my family.You would avoid marriage or just avoid marrying a woman because she happens to make more than you?
Which sounds like it could be a woman who happens to grab the big cup before you can get to it. Just kidding just kidding
Oh, you know, an awful lot of guys oppose women's rights because they perceive that it is to their advantage to be the oppressor.
I was just reading this tribute to Barbara Billingsley who played June Cleaver in the TV show "Leave it to Beaver":
As June Cleaver, Billingsley was the personification of an Eisenhower-era stay-at-home mom — at least one residing in fictional Mayfield, U.S.A.: a mild-mannered, perfectly coiffed housewife who typically wore dresses, high heels and a strand of white pearls even while vacuuming or baking cookies for her boys.
"She was the ideal mother," Billingsley said of her character in 1997 in TV Guide. "Some people think she was weakish, but I don't. She was the love in that family. She set a good example for what a wife could be. I had two boys at home when I did the show. I think the character became kind of like me and vice versa. I've never known where one started and where one stopped."
Yeah, "some people" like NOW feminists think that staying at home and raising children to become responsible adults is "weakish".