Wile E. Coyote
New member
:up:
toldailytopic: Should business owners have the right to not serve a gay customer?
Yes, if it is privately owned.
:up:
toldailytopic: Should business owners have the right to not serve a gay customer?
Yes, if it is privately owned.
I believe that privately owned businesses should have the legal right to refuse service to anyone for any reason their little old heart desires.
However, having said that, I would also not expect the business owner to bellyache over any verbal backlash or loss of business that results from their desire to operate their business as they see fit.
No. If a business is open to the public, it is obliged to serve the public, and not just those members of the public that pleases the business owner. If a business owner does not want to serve the public as a whole, then they can open their business as a private club or co-op, and serve or refuse to serve whomever they like. So the option is already there. All society asks is that business owners state their intent up front, so that they don't waste the time and resources of people they do not intend to serve.
Religious bookstores sell religious books. Christian religious bookstores sell Christian religious books. They don't "cater to religious beliefs". They just sell books. Why would someone who owns a religious bookstore care or even know what their customer's beliefs are? If someone wants to buy a religious book, and you are in the business of selling that particular book, then you sell them the book. Right?So a christian bookstore should cater to all religious beliefs and secular beliefs and be just a bookstore?
I think you could argue that under a business consideration as it could impact your business negatively by making it appear you endorse the particular views you're actively presenting. But then, I believe in exceptions under a reasonable man standard, which is why Knight's concern about the Catholic hospital wouldn't be problematic.
I think that's arguable, depending on what's being asked, under my reasonable man standard. For instance, you shouldn't be forced to put something graphic and offensive on the cake, but the names of the couple in question? I don't think writing Steve and Steve should rise to that level. And regardless, you shouldn't have the right to refuse to sell your cake to someone because you're a racist or hate conservatives and Limbaugh needs a lunch.
I agree. You would be offering a service to the public that includes and depends upon your personal creative and intellectual reputation. You must certainly have the right to refuse such a request on the basis of it being not in your specific field of service, as well as perhaps being harmful to your professional reputation.If I am a privately owned decorating business, then I have the right to refuse to decorate a house in a way that is offensive to me, such as Satanic decor, Sadomasochist decor, KKK decor, etc.
Again, I agree. For the same reasons as above.And if I am a privately owned cake business, then I have the right to refuse to decorate a cake in a way that is offensive to me, such as homosexual, sexually explicit, racism, etc.
The TheologyOnline.com TOPIC OF THE DAY for July 31st, 2012 09:07 AM
toldailytopic: Should (straight) business owners have the right to not serve a gay customer?
Should gay business owners have the right to not serve a straight customer?
Should gay business owners have the right to not serve a straight customer?
Why not?
Can't you turn away the Neo-Nazi kid who wants to wash your car simply based on his political views?
Because it's stupid, rude, unfair, and insulting. And since that doesn't seem to matter to some people, it's also a form of discrimination based on personal prejudice. And most grown-ups in modern civilized societies know that encouraging that sort of behavior is counter-productive to social order and to maintaining a positive, peaceful, social environment.
Of course I can. I don't see how this is relevant. I'm not a business and neither is the kid.
Even if it is rude or unfair, that's part of life. Why in the world would someone insist or even want to spend their money in an establishment that has made it clear they are not welcome?
For easy money (lawsuit) and notoriety.
That's on them. While I might say a few choice words TO the individuals refusing service to me as well as tell family and friends of the situation, I would also realize that there are more deserving businesses for me to spend my money.
Or because they refuse to take that sort of treatment as though someone was entitled to give them the back of their hand. Just another perspective. Maybe they're just looking or equity, not notoriety.For easy money (lawsuit) and notoriety.
Or because they refuse to take that sort of treatment as though someone was entitled to give them the back of their hand. Just another perspective. Maybe they're just looking or equity, not notoriety.
I never thought of it that way...but then, I don't drink like I did as an undergrad.If they want to be equals, they shouldn't be homos.
Yes! That's the point!Should gay business owners have the right to not serve a straight customer?