Actually they do, when it's coupled with social change that makes ownership of guns a taboo. I think I only know one person who owns a gun, for hunting. If you take this argument ad absurdium then you can legalise anything, such as carrying firearms onto planes, or having abortions, or etc. The idea that 'someone, somewhere, might break the law' is sufficient to legalise it, then why have any laws to start off with?
Shootings of this scale are far rarer in countries with tighter gun legislation. In the UK, 0.17 people per 100,000 die from being shot, with a murder rate of 1.28/100,000 overall. Knife crime accounts for the highest category of weapons leading to fatalities. In the US, there is a murder rate of 5.0/100,000 with firearms being the main cause of death.
The UK has probably the strictest gun crime laws in the world, and there is a link between gun crime and murders.
The most recent attempted assassination was when an MP was stabbed last year. The MP survived and no one else was injured. Before that, the only thing I can think of is the Grand Hotel Bombing, Brighton, in which 5 people died.
This is not to say of course, that the UK is perfect, which it definitely isn't. It has one of the highest crime rates in the EU. However, gun crime is mercifully low.
How does the mainstream media sleep at night? If you watch NBC, ABC, CBS, CNN, etc you would think the shooter was a right wing nutball instead of the left wing wacko that he really was.
It's amazing how irresponsible the mainstream media is.
Why not just believe the people who knew him?Lets be real here, the guy was NUTS. I am not sure we can really ascribe "left or right"
Lets be real here, the guy was NUTS. I am not sure we can really ascribe "left or right" to someone that thinks the government is engaging in mind control through the use of GRAMMAR. :kookoo: We do know he was anti-government, and the loudest howls against government lately have come from the right.
And it wasn't members of the left that had to go out and remove statements that implied violence from their websites . . .
Pass a law that requires that all citizens twenty years old and upward must carry a loaded firearm and at least 20 rounds of amunition whenever they are not in their home. This solution will make for a safer and freer country.
I would rather go to prison than own a firearm. Particularly one to be carried in public.
They should never have taken it down. Anyone who sees that pic as promoting violence is a complete moron. One shouldn't cater to morons.
Angle: I feel that the Second Amendment is the right to keep and bear arms for our citizenry. This not for someone who's in the military. This not for law enforcement. This is for us. And in fact when you read that Constitution and the founding fathers, they intended this to stop tyranny. This is for us when our government becomes tyrannical... Manders: If we needed it at any time in history, it might be right now. Angle: Well it's to defend ourselves. And you know, I'm hoping that we're not getting to Second Amendment remedies. I hope the vote will be the cure for the Harry Reid problems. |
Actually they do, when it's coupled with social change that makes ownership of guns a taboo. I think I only know one person who owns a gun, for hunting. If you take this argument ad absurdium then you can legalise anything, such as carrying firearms onto planes, or having abortions, or etc. The idea that 'someone, somewhere, might break the law' is sufficient to legalise it, then why have any laws to start off with?
Shootings of this scale are far rarer in countries with tighter gun legislation. In the UK, 0.17 people per 100,000 die from being shot, with a murder rate of 1.28/100,000 overall. Knife crime accounts for the highest category of weapons leading to fatalities. In the US, there is a murder rate of 5.0/100,000 with firearms being the main cause of death.
The UK has probably the strictest gun crime laws in the world, and there is a link between gun crime and murders.
The most recent attempted assassination was when an MP was stabbed last year. The MP survived and no one else was injured. Before that, the only thing I can think of is the Grand Hotel Bombing, Brighton, in which 5 people died.
This is not to say of course, that the UK is perfect, which it definitely isn't. It has one of the highest crime rates in the EU. However, gun crime is mercifully low.
How does the mainstream media sleep at night? If you watch NBC, ABC, CBS, CNN, etc you would think the shooter was a right wing nutball instead of the left wing wacko that he really was.
It's amazing how irresponsible the mainstream media is.
You must like seeing jackboots stomping on a human face.This is short sighted and moronic. Firing a weapon in a populated area has a high chance of hitting innocent bystanders as much as anyone causing a crime. We have trained people that carry guns, they're called police.
You must like seeing jackboots stomping on a human face.
Why are you even bringing this up? The shooter was clearly a left wing lunatic.I can get plenty more examples. Show us recent examples from the left. I am honestly interested in seeing if the "both sides do it" mantra is actually true.
Better than seeing a bullet go through one . . .
How does the mainstream media sleep at night? If you watch NBC, ABC, CBS, CNN, etc you would think the shooter was a right wing nutball instead of the left wing wacko that he really was.
It's amazing how irresponsible the mainstream media is.
Its ironic that on the news this morning they were complaining about the political climate in the US, and then blaming Palin for this shooting.
Yet it turns out the guy was a flaming lefty so blaming Palin is obviously in error.Putting crosshairs on one's political opponents has consequences, yes. Remember the congresswoman who was shot had her office vandalized not long after Palin suggested "reloading" and "taking out" those she had targeted.