she doesn't have to stay home
But you don't believe she should be married UNLESS she is having children ... remember?
she doesn't have to stay home
. . . :liberals: . . . really?
. . . so much for a good meringue then . . . :sigh:.
. . . and YOU speak for ALL children I assume . . .the child prefers it that way
who will take care of the child?
But you don't believe she should be married UNLESS she is having children ... remember?
. . . not when you give meaningless answers . . . :troll:.answering questions is really neat
no
and
no
. . . not when you give meaningless answers . . . :troll:.
answering questions is really neat
Since ALL marriages do not produce children, and you agree that even the one's that do cannot always have a stay at home parent, what is you objection, Chrys?
Is there some difference between a gay father driving his child to daycare as compared to a heterosexual mother driving her child to daycare?
. . . no . . . just :troll:s like you who put the wrong end of a horse as their avatar.you seem to have trouble with meaning and purpose
any child
how do you separate marriage and children
divorce?
How would you even know? You've not got around to them yet.
:yawn:
who will take care of the child?
. . . but a homosexual couple (or a homosexual individual) can indeed RAISE and CARE FOR a child . . . :thumb:.a homosexual union cannot produce a child
the child prefers it that way
Simple ... if the couple does not have children, there is nothing to separate.
If a couple does have children, then the divorce simply separates their parents from living together.
Now, IF you wish to discuss divorce, start another thread.