toldailytopic: Monsters! What (yet to be discovered) creatures are the most likely to

Status
Not open for further replies.

Nathon Detroit

LIFETIME MEMBER
LIFETIME MEMBER
The TheologyOnline.com TOPIC OF THE DAY for April 7th, 2010 10:54 AM


toldailytopic: Monsters! What (yet to be discovered) creatures are the most likely to actually be real?






Take the topic above and run with it! Slice it, dice it, give us your general thoughts about it. Everyday there will be a new TOL Topic of the Day.
If you want to make suggestions for the Topic of the Day send a Tweet to @toldailytopic or @theologyonline or send it to us via Facebook.
 

Nathon Detroit

LIFETIME MEMBER
LIFETIME MEMBER
New creatures are still being discovered in remote parts of this world, for instance...

Philippines dragon-sized lizard is a new species

What other yet to be discovered creatures might exist out there????

Maybe...

Chupacabras, Bigfoot, Yeti, the Loch Ness Monster, the Jersey Devil, Mothman, Yowie, Yeren, Pukwudgie???

Or how about...

Mermaids?? Or possibly the Kraken?? :chuckle:

Some folks think some dinosaurs still exist in remote portions of the world.

It's fun thinking about such animals what do you think are the most likely living monsters?
 

Nick M

Plymouth Colonist
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
I saw the giant Flip lizzard on Yahoo today. There is no monster in Loch Ness, not feasable. Other water monsters, sure. But probably not like that or a Cracken.
 

Lucky

New member
Hall of Fame
Demons aka devils aka fallen angels. Not entirely undiscovered, but we don't really know a whole lot about those monsters. I'm sure Freak would say he deals with them all the time.
 

hahnz

New member
I saw the giant Flip lizzard on Yahoo today. There is no monster in Loch Ness, not feasable. Other water monsters, sure. But probably not like that or a Cracken.


consider the ceolacanth

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coelacanth

T"he coelacanths, which are related to lungfishes and tetrapods, were believed to have been extinct since the end of the Cretaceous period. They were considered the "missing link" between the fish and the tetrapods until the first Latimeria specimen was found off the east coast of South Africa, off the Chalumna River in 1938. They are, therefore, a Lazarus taxon."


Just curious...what evidence shows you that a small population of semi-large underwater creatures could not live in a deep cavernous lake such as Loch Ness?
 

Ktoyou

Well-known member
Hall of Fame
What might be possible would be larger than known, such as Carcharodon carcharias to exist today, large sharks though extinct might exist in the deep today. something close the a megalodon, but a decedent. Also this is more likely speculation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top