Son of Jack
New member
What mosque? The external world is a lie. :idunno:
Thanks, Plotinus...:idunno:
What mosque? The external world is a lie. :idunno:
I fully agree with you here.
The differences YOU see in Muslims, and the conflicts between Muslims, has to do with strategy, not agenda. By violence or by stealth, the goal is the same.Hmm. I live a couple of streets away from a local mosque. We have a fair share of Muslims in the area and funnily enough there's been no trouble at all. I guess they must all be scheming against the 'enemy' right? Get a grip. When you do you might just be in a position to criticise other people's intelligence. Maybe. Possibly. Well probably not but get a grip anyway. :e4e:
Thanks, Plotinus...:idunno:
The differences YOU see in Muslims, and the conflicts between Muslims, has to do with strategy, not agenda. By violence or by stealth, the goal is the same.
Drink your coffee. You'll feel better....
lain:
I hope there is something more in it than sugar and creamer...lain:
You are sadly naive.It's a wonder you walk out of your front door. What you're implying is as nuts as equating Fred Phelps blather with Christianity.
TaqiyyaOf course it's just plain insanity to think that most just want to live in peace with their families and coexist right?
Islam | |
I hope there is something more in it than sugar and creamer...lain:
Whiskey isn't for pouring things into, lad. It's for pouring into. In moderation, of course.I once put Jack Daniels in my coffee. It wasn't nearly as good as I expected it to be. lain:
Fact, that you deny, not Islam.
You said "baloney", when it is a fact that Islam will not deny regarding the deaths of children from collateral damage. That is how they justify it.Please explain.
Well there's some spare cyanide if you want?
Cyanide - Metallica | |
What mosque? The external world is a lie. :idunno:
As a friend of mine commented earlier today: It's a bit hypocritical for us to complain about creating a mosque next to Ground Zero, when in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan we've been creating Ground Zeroes next to mosques for almost a decade.
Or how about the Christian missionary groups that have been allowed to go and try to convert people in Iraq and other places. Where is the sensitivity there?As a friend of mine commented earlier today: It's a bit hypocritical for us to complain about creating a mosque next to Ground Zero, when in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan we've been creating Ground Zeroes next to mosques for almost a decade.
As opposed to viewing the one that the builder currently has 5 blocks away from ground zero? The new one will be 3 blocks away. And what about people who attend the current mosque 5 blocks away? They lost family on 911 too. It seems like a bunch of paranoia for no reason. New mosque more offensive than the current one 5 blocks away?Though I realize this will seem politically incorrect, I believe it is in bad taste to build a mosque at ground zero.
Even though I realize that not all Muslims are terrorists, to the family members of those victims who died on 9/11, it is disrespectful. These are the individuals whose feelings should be taken into account.
The mosque can be built elsewhere ... however, the deaths of all of those who lost their lives on 9/11 will forever be linked to this sacred spot.
Why in the world should grieving families who want to visit this spot have to view a building which is representative of the terrorists who did the deed?
As others have pointed out, it isn't really at ground zero. At least it depends on how you define "ground zero".Though I realize this will seem politically incorrect, I believe it is in bad taste to build a mosque at ground zero.
Unless the builders of this mosque are like-minded with the terrorists who attacked us, how is it disrespectful?Even though I realize that not all Muslims are terrorists, to the family members of those victims who died on 9/11, it is disrespectful. These are the individuals whose feelings should be taken into account.
I will partially agree that the mosque and cultural center could be built somewhere else and I kind of wish Rauf had never started this. But since we're here....The mosque can be built elsewhere ... however, the deaths of all of those who lost their lives on 9/11 will forever be linked to this sacred spot.
The mosque shouldn't represent the terrorists, though. In my opinion, it only represents the terrorists to those who wrongly believe we are at war with Islam. Fighting this mosque just feeds into that wrong conception. And it risks making violent extremists out of moderates.Why in the world should grieving families who want to visit this spot have to view a building which is representative of the terrorists who did the deed?