Again, here we can see the use of imprecise language in order to elicit an emotional response. A mother does not 'murder' her child since 'murder' is unlawful killing. Since abortion is legal (within a limited timespan) then a legal abortion cannot be simultaneously within the law and unlawful. This is why it is misleading to refer to it as 'murder'.
If your sister were pregnant, would you correct her if she refered to it as her baby?Just to be accurate, it's 'foetus', not baby.
I wasn't aware of a study linking breast cancer to abortion, but I am aware that studies have shown that there are fewer cases of breast cancer in women who have breastfed their children.
Actually there is a large amount of "raw data" that shows the connection.The concept seems reasonable from a biological-hormonal perspective. Although there is no raw data to observe, I would not debate the conclusion on face value. Stripe has a good point, regardless, abortion destroys the baby's' life!
The one doesn't preclude the other. And it's not unusual for people using the term to do so as a means of dehumanizing the baby and tends to be the sort of verbiage used by people who support the procedure.It isn't vulgar, it's a medical term.
I don't love all life. I don't love the flowers that grow in my garden, though I take pleasure in their beauty. I don't love the infection in a damaged digit that I treat with antibiotics. And as a born omnivore I have the same difficulty with consuming meat that you should rationally expect, which is to say none.Using medical terms does not preclude one from feeling love for one's own baby, of course, or love for all life (I've often wondered how staunch anti-abortionists square this position with eating the flesh of animals, but that's an aside).
Then I'd say you have an awfully selective love going there yourself. At least mine has species loyalty built into it.To get back to the point about abortion, I think those women who choose to terminate their pregnancies, for whatever reasons, within the legal limit, are quite entitled to do so and that I am in no position to judge them.
Oh, I don't know. I'm not willing to speculate on an inherent or acquired moral deficiency in the whole of a nation simply because you get it horrifically wrong.Of course, I am speaking from the UK, so the cultural divide might, I suspect, be wide open on this particular topic!
It isn't vulgar, it's a medical term.
Actually there is a large amount of "raw data" that shows the connection.
There is a wealth of info on the web about the connection.
The connection makes a ton of sense if you think about it... here is an easy to read page that explains why there would be a connection between breast cancer and abortion.
Just to be accurate, it's 'foetus', not baby.
I wasn't aware of a study linking breast cancer to abortion, but I am aware that studies have shown that there are fewer cases of breast cancer in women who have breastfed their children.
Just to be accurate, it's 'foetus', not baby.
I wasn't aware of a study linking breast cancer to abortion, but I am aware that studies have shown that there are fewer cases of breast cancer in women who have breastfed their children.
Knight, can't you add this to the ToL Rules? Whoever says this gets an insta-ban? :noid:
Knight, can't you add this to the ToL Rules? Whoever says this gets an insta-ban? :noid:
Knight, can't you add this to the ToL Rules? Whoever says this gets an insta-ban? :noid:
There is a wealth of info on the web about the connection.
The connection makes a ton of sense if you think about it... here is an easy to read page that explains why there would be a connection between breast cancer and abortion.
Just to be accurate, it's 'foetus', not baby.