OK, someone needs a lesson in how to speak and read.
lain: Wonderful. That really changes...nothing...ever.
When you read something you need to engage your brain because there are things called inferences, metaphors and other things.
You mean right after Genesis.
So far as I can see it, we both believe that God is the author of creation and that Genesis speaks to this. You see six days as the context determining how we read everything around it and I see everything around it as the context for how we read six days.
When the bible talks about the four corners of the Earth we can recognise that as a metaphor because we have an explanation that grants understanding in a non-literal sense.
Rather, you choose to understand the literary device in use, the approach that isn't literal. No where does the scripture state it as less than or other than literal. You apply a larger understanding to arrive at the context.
Just so. And for your pains there would undoubtedly been someone to call you stupid, your understanding at odds with God's word, etc. There's never a shortage of that sort of person.
Now the rarer thing to find, when you're less than dead set on a proposition and curious about how others could read it differently, as I was at the outset of this thing that should have been a conversation, is to find someone who can say, "I understand why you think that, but have you considered this..." or "Well, I'd agree if not for this..."
That sort of person is interested in illuminating a truth...which begs the question, what are you interested in doing?
This..this I'm not interested in. If you know someone who shares your opinion who'd actually like to tell me why and help me see that side of it better tell them to give me a nudge.
:e4e: