That Jesus is the Christ is not the gospel of Christ!
By definition the gospel of Christ is the gospel Christ preached, not a gospel about Christ. Christ's gospel was that we must be born of the Spirit. Why do you deny that?
That Jesus is the Christ is not the gospel of Christ!
The Gospel is the objective fact that justifies from sin; yes a person must believe that. After that is settled, a person works out their salvation in honor of Christ. "What shall I give unto the Lord, for all he's done for me?" Ps 130.
We are not justified from sins by what goes on inside us, but things do go on in us when we are grateful for the gift of justification.
Lk 24 is post resurrection! The Lord opened the scriptures to them and they understood. As I said, the preached according to the revelation they had received. You have called me a liar and a deceiver. Now, who does that remind you of?
Pete ��
The context is resurrection.
Deal with this and forget the complications you offer up:
"Jesus' death on the cross redeemed you [a fact]. His Life within you is what you need to save you [a faith venture]".
Exactly and the end result of the gospel is this:
1 Corinthians 15:24 Then cometh the end when he shall have delivered up the kingdom to God, even the Father...
This is the good news of the kingdom of God.
The Gospel is the objective fact that justifies from sin; yes a person must believe that. After that is settled, a person works out their salvation in honor of Christ. "What shall I give unto the Lord, for all he's done for me?" Ps 130.
We are not justified from sins by what goes on inside us, but things do go on in us when we are grateful for the gift of justification.
The Lord Himself and the 12 preached the gospel of the kingdom for three years while the Lord walked the earth (Matthew 4:23 KJV).
The gospel Paul received and preached is that Christ died for our sins, that He was buried and rose again the third day (1 Corinthians 15:1-4 KJV).
There is no way those two gospels are the same.
You lied again, as you said that they did know of it
"V34 shows that the disciples had limited revelation until post resurrection. Lk 24 and the verses I have quoted confirms such. "-you
The had no revelation of the impending dbr-it was hid from them.
You were shown, chapter and verse, where the 12 had no clue that the Lord Jesus Christ would die, and be raised again, the foundation of the 1 Cor. 15:1-4 KJV good news, as it was hid from them, until after its fulfillment, and yet, they did preach for approximately 3 years, the gospel/good news of the kingdom, during a time in which it was not revealed to them.
Stop your deception.
:up:
A complete impossibility of being the same. Otherwise, words have no meaning at all and we may as well chuck the Bible and watch tv.
:up:
A complete impossibility of being the same. Otherwise, words have no meaning at all and we may as well chuck the Bible and watch tv.
John: 2. 22. When therefore he was risen from the dead, his disciples remembered that he had said this unto them; and they believed the scripture, and the word which Jesus had said.
As I said, limited. Jesus told them and that means limited revelation:
Matthew: 17. 22. And while they abode in Galilee, Jesus said unto them, The Son of man shall be betrayed into the hands of men: 23. And they shall kill him, and the third day he shall be raised again. And they were exceeding sorry.
They were sorry! They understood as best they could at the time. You have been shown chapter and verse. I will not call you a deceiver for I believe that you are deceived yourself. Anyway I thought I answered this post. ��
Pete ��
That is only your opinion, not the view of the Bible.
You expect people to believe that after Christ rose from the dead and opened their understanding and showed them Himself mentioned in the OT, (His sacrifice for sin and all) that they soon forgot until Paul came along,
when Paul himself entered into the Body of Christ the same as all others in the book of Acts.
You must think all people are stupid.
LA
:up:
A complete impossibility of being the same. Otherwise, words have no meaning at all and we may as well chuck the Bible and watch tv.
Jesus only taught what the Father allowed him to teach. The disciples who traveled with Jesus did not truly understand scripture until they had God's Spirit. The same is true of Paul.
You can't make statements like that until you diagram in Greek. It is more precise than English because there is a distinct spelling for several cases.
The first line (above) is not saying that the gospel is about the kingdom; it is saying that there is one that is joined with it, that comes with it, that works synergistically with it. Which we know from the case of the prepositional phrase.
We know that as he was born, the fact that he would save people from their sins was being preached. We know that as his ministry started he was called the Lamb of God in public. Duh, what's a lamb for in 1st century Judaism?
By definition the gospel of Christ is the gospel Christ preached, not a gospel about Christ. Christ's gospel was that we must be born of the Spirit. Why do you deny that?
Yep!:up:
A complete impossibility of being the same. Otherwise, words have no meaning at all and we may as well chuck the Bible and watch tv.
There is only one Gospel: Find it!