Traditio said:
QED.
"What need have we of witnesses?"
If you knew anything about music, you would know that beat is a musical concept. Hip hop and rap focuses on beat and rhytm over melody.
Not in the context in which I was speaking. RexLunae's claim was that white people have benefited because of slavery unjustly, and that in comparable cases, the defendants of such a case should have to forfeit their gains to the plaintiffs.
The question I subsequently asked:
Is it the case that, in the long run, we actually have gained more than we have lost?
"We have gained" and "we have lost". Are they not part of that "we" themselves? What if their lacking productivity is due to the very abuse they seek reparations for?
Against this claim, I present rap music. Nuff said.
Your musical preference is not an argument.
Enough to know that it generally involves instruments.
So acapella and Gregorian chant is not music? That's a rather strange definition of music.
Music is defined by instruments only insofar that instruments are what makes us able to produce melody, beat, rhytm and harmony.
Hip-hop and rap doesn't use instruments? It may use synthesizers and the human voice and what not, but their purpose is to produce melody, beat, rhytm, melody and harmony as well. Rap and Hip hop focusing on beat and rhytm.
Yes, because social scientists have no idea how to check correlations and form proper hypotheses...
Let's suppose that I'm a racist. Calling me a racist isn't an argument in favor of your position or against mine. It's a complete ad hominem
It would be an ad hominem fallacy if I followed it up with a "therefore you are wrong".
"You are an idiot." Is not an ad hominem fallacy, it is just rude.
"You are an idiot, therefore you are wrong." That would be an ad hominem fallacy.