God's Truth
New member
You do not have to answer me, and if you do answer me, I doubt that it would be the truth. However, have you ever been diagnosed with a disability?
The Trinity
- Thread starter Bright Raven
- Start date
You do not have to answer me, and if you do answer me, I doubt that it would be the truth. However, have you ever been diagnosed with a disability?
Yes. But I do not believe that I have ever had a disability.
God's Truth
New member
Again, you don't have to answer me but have you ever been in special ed?
lifeisgood
New member
Ah, No. We have conversations, but not debate.
Debate is what AMR and you did.
What we do is an exchange of information.
Obviously! :duh:
Oh, so now, you, gt, do not say that you OBEYED ALL Jesus said EXACTLY and then say you don't. :think:
Who is saying otherwise? He says, 'Come, and I, Jesus, will give you MY rest. Just come and I will give you My rest.' (Matthew 11:28). He did not say, 'OBEY and I will give you rest.' He simply said, 'Come and I will do everything you need to receive my rest. I'll gift my rest to you. Just come and receive.' And that was BEFORE He finished His work.
Honestly? No.
Every single time you say I'm 'Linda Blair', 'crazy', 'delusional', 'not all there', 'dishonest', etc., you, gt, say that you will no longer talk with someone of my aptitude and then you continue to talk to such a person as myself.
lifeisgood
New member
gt found "la horma de sus zapatos" with Jacob. :chuckle:
God's Truth
New member
No, we are debating.
Jesus said that to those who were OBEYING God. They were doing all the works of the law and the heavy load the Pharisees put on them.
That was because you kept on incessantly saying the things I said made you want to throw up. It reminded me of the set up from that movie with Linda Blair, where a priest was trying to help the girl who was possessed by Satan and who threw up at the priest.
I do not keep discussing with dishonest people. I put up with a lot but dishonesty is something I will not. It is why I stopped debating Lon and EE, for instance. You are dishonest, you know that you have called me Satan repeatedly, post after post after post, and other names.
The only reason why I started to debate you again was because you started acting better.
This thread needs to get back on topic.
God's Truth
New member
Why don't you quote one of their posts which shows that they are the ones who changed the topic?
I will wait for your honest response.
That was my point. You are normally on topic, others tend stray. Oh, thanks for but why the neg rep.
God's Truth
New member
So you try to reprimand me? It doesn't wash. You got the neg rep reprimand because you are being unfair.
I did not reprimand you. if you read the second post carefully you will see that you were complimented. I only used your post to get into the conversation, not to reprimand anything.
God's Truth
New member
I stand by what I said and what I believe. You have had me unfairly banned before and accused me of going off topic while I was ONLY ANSWERING YOUR posts to me.
Good enough. But I did not reprimand you.
God's Truth
New member
I don't discuss with dishonest people. It is getting limited here.
I am deist. I don't believe in sunday worship, nor do I believe in the pre-existence beyond a virgin birth. I don't believe so needed the christ Jesus, that he couldn't replace him if necessary.
glorydaz
Well-known member
Then you deny John 1....by default.
No, your corrupt english translation of it as empirical evidence. You don't even know the meaning of the Greek (aka Hellene) behind it.
And you accept idolatry by default.
The first 2 Greek words are rendered rightly. But the next 2 have subtle errors. It should be "In the beginning, it was, a word and...". (h)hn like all greek verbs have subjects just like pronouns 1,2,3 person plural and singular. The article is only attached before any name or noun to deemphasize it. Next is "a word, and a word it with a god." The god created the word which is nothing more than a statement in language. Next is "And the god it is, a word a thing it was in the beginning with a god." The god is the word YaHWeH, but only one of many words.So you're saying that this is incorrect?
The word is not defined by fire as mistaken by Justin Martyr. Nor is a flaming Phoenix aka Pteradon like Clement of Rome believed. Nor is the word Jesus as Ignatius and Ireneaus believed, in spite of what Polycarp tried and lied to correct.
Thus Polycarp got it most correct, but we don't know enough about him. And Clement and Justin combined unitarianism with pre-millinialism and stoicism
The term logoi exists in Koine. So there is not one of them.