Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Par for the course with trolls...Don't change my quote when you quote my post.
That's being deceptive.
Par for the course with trolls...Don't change my quote when you quote my post.
That's being deceptive.
The UK--the British Isles--wouldn't be there if it weren't for Knight?This place wouldn't even be here for anyone to giggle at anything if it weren't for Knight.
Wonder how many likes you'll get for that.The UK--the British Isles--wouldn't be there if it weren't for Knight?
Probably about 15% of them. Or more (if you count the others).Wonder how many likes you'll get for that.
Oh, I'm sure you'll get some at any rate.Probably about 15% of them. Or more (if you count the others).
Probably over 81,000.Oh, I'm sure you'll get some at any rate.
Don't assume my beliefs.The only part of this I'm interested in, Tam, is your apparent belief that everybody here should expect to be treated with love and kindness.
Why not?I'm not interested in getting in a debate over Nick's choice of words.
Go back through the thread and look at what I was responding toDon't assume my beliefs.
Because you are unable to operate on anything other than emotionWhy not?
I have no way of knowing whether it is untrue (and neither do you), and your description of it as hateful is rooted in emotion.Is your friendship with Nick so fragile that it would crumble to dust if you were to voice a distaste when he says something that is so hateful (and untrue to boot)?
Apparently you're getting too "emotional" if you criticize an unfounded accusation and it should be all okay to go around accusing certain people of being child molesters, despite there being no evidence for it, as long as they're the "right" people of course. This place is a joke nowadays.Don't assume my beliefs.
Why not?
Is your friendship with Nick so fragile that it would crumble to dust if you were to voice a distaste when he says something that is so hateful (and untrue to boot)?
You have been responding to my posts about Nick's unsavory character assassination of a member without a shred of evidence of it being true.Go back through the thread and look at what I was responding to
False.Because you are unable to operate on anything other than emotion
So what????I have no way of knowing whether it is untrue (and neither do you),
No it's not rooted in emotion, it's rooted in common sense of what is an inappropriate thing to do.and your description of it as hateful is rooted in emotion.
Lord I hope this place doesn't go the ways of the far left and start covering for the inappropriate behavior of certain club members.Apparently you're getting too "emotional" if you criticize an unfounded accusation and it should be all okay to go around accusing certain people of being child molesters, despite there being no evidence for it, as long as they're the "right" people of course. This place is a joke nowadays.
I've been responding to a very specific part of your postsYou have been responding to my posts
Not that partabout Nick's unsavory character assassination of a member without a shred of evidence of it being true.
That's an emotional responseFalse.
It doesn't take emotions to notice that he engaged in a vile character assassination with no evidence at all.
So you're throwing an emotional tirade at Nick because you don't believe what he's saying is trueSo what????
I wouldn't be surprised if Nick believes that he has substantiationWhy on earth would that excuse someone of making such an unsubstantiated character assassination???
"Vile" is an emotional response.Is it because you care more about spouting vile and unsubstantiated character assassination than truth?
Are we called by Christ to be kind to people who embrace perversion and reject the gospel message?No it's not rooted in emotion, it's rooted in common sense of what is an unkind thing to do.
No.I've been responding to a very specific part of your posts
Why not?Not that part
Nope.That's an emotional response
It's neither emotional nor a tirade.So you're throwing an emotional tirade at Nick
Are you so blind that you cannot recognize that accusing someone of something as vile as being a child molester without any substantiation is a wrong thing to do????because you don't believe what he's saying is true
I see you are still trying to cover up inappropriate behavior with a bunch of unsubstantiated "what ifs" instead of facts.I wouldn't be surprised if Nick believes that he has substantiation
Child molesters are vile."Vile" is an emotional response.
My guess is he said it based on what you have been writing in your support of the child trafficking that The Sound Of Freedom has been trying to expose. When you think about it, his accusation is basically an accusation that you're not right in the head, no? But you spend most of your time on TOL accusing others of being not right in the head, on account of what they write. For example:Apparently you're getting too "emotional" if you criticize an unfounded accusation and it should be all okay to go around accusing certain people of being child molesters, despite there being no evidence for it,
Anyone who claims that Trump is still president needs a psych evaluation
Well, the far left and the far right aren't too much different really but unsubstantiated claims of child molesting should be held to account. I challenge anyone to substantiate any claims where it comes to myself and I know they won't as they know they'd fail. So, those who claim I'm a child molesting queer - bring it on and show your proof!Lord I hope this place doesn't go the ways of the far left and start covering for the inappropriate behavior of certain club members.
But I don't think it will as long as Sherman is here, who has the common sense to recognize it as inappropriate.
Trolls are limited in their arsenal and are hardly the most intelligent of posters and you've taken this down more than ably. Cheers.No.
Rather than reply to my concern, you tried to move the goalpost.
Why not?
Nope.
It's a logical observation.
It's neither emotional nor a tirade.
Are you so blind that you cannot recognize that accusing someone of something as vile as being a child molester without any substantiation is a wrong thing to do????
I see you are still trying to cover up inappropriate behavior with a bunch of unsubstantiated "what ifs" instead of facts.
Child molesters are vile.
That's not an emotional statement, it's common sense.
And to accuse someone of something so vile with without any substantiation is no where near being Christlike.
Then he should have been astute enough to realize that my objection to the film wasn't rooted in any support for child trafficking but rather several criticisms made by those who dispute the claims of the film - including by plenty involved in anti child/sex trafficking. I've supplied plenty of links on the score to that effect.My guess is he said it based on what you have been writing in your support of the child trafficking that The Sound Of Freedom has been trying to expose. When you think about it, his accusation is basically an accusation that you're not right in the head, no? But you spend most of your time on TOL accusing others of being not right in the head, on account of what they write. For example:
Why your double standard, hypocrite?
You're on record calling the film's exposure of child trafficking, "garbage". That's you showing your support for child trafficking by showing that you'd prefer the film's exposure of child trafficking to be suppressed.Then he should have been astute enough to realize that my objection to the film wasn't rooted in any support for child trafficking
Then he should have been astute enough to realize that my objection to the film wasn't rooted in any support for child trafficking but rather several criticisms made by those who dispute the claims of the film...
I just saw The Sound of Freedom, and I want my money back. I waited 2 whole hours for the Satanic, Elite Cabal, Democratic Party, pizza party scene that I was promised by the media. And it never came. I bought tickets under the impression that it was some far right Q movie. But instead, it was just some boring movie about human trafficking. Would journalists really do that to me? Would journalists really go on the internet and tell lies?