In a conversation it generally helps if you would actually respond to what I post instead of ignoring it and starting another conversation. Please answer this post to you which shows you some things. If you don't believe my take is correct, please explain how I am wrong:
That is what I did here:
In the new covenant, God has given all judgment over who will enter the kingdom and receive eternal life to Jesus.
The sacrifices in God's written law are no longer used to cover our sins. They were abolished because of the abuse of the sacrificial system and the acceptance of a more perfect sacrifice.
God's standards of behavior from the written law (do not murder, do not steal) were a shadow of the new covenant law that is written in our hearts.
Jesus judges our suitability to enter the kingdom of God through the new covenant law that is written in our hearts. Instead of do not commit adultery, the law that is written in our hearts says do not even lust over another man's wife. Instead of do not murder, the law that is written in our hearts says do not even hate another.
In the new covenant law that is written in our hearts, the two greatest commandments are love God with all our heart, mind, soul, and strength, and love our neighbor as ourselves.
Your mistake comes from a fundamental misunderstanding of the new covenant.
If what you say is true, and we have to do this or that to be/stay saved, then why did Paul say what he said? Why do you want to be judged based on your working while Paul did not? What is the righteousness that is imputed to us?
The problem is not what Paul said, the problem is that you don't understand what Paul said because you are not looking at his writings from his perspective.
Paul was raised as a Pharisee, and was taught that righteousness came from following the law and traditions of the Pharisees without any need to have a relationship with God. Paul was having to deal with the Jews that were taught that God's commandments were so strict that they had to build a fence around the law in order to keep from accidentally transgressing a commandment.
After his conversion, Paul understood that we needed to gain God's favor (grace) to be saved, and no amount of law or traditions could subsitute for having a relationship with Him.
Paul used the examples of the men in the Bible that had obtained God's favor through their relationships with Him. Abraham was looked upon by God with favor because he demonstrated his love and respect for God through his obedience to God's commands. When God looked into Abraham's heart, He saw that Abraham did not do works that he thought would gain him a reward from God, instead God saw that Abraham did works because of his love and respect for God. This is the kind of faith that God counts as righteousness (imputed).
Paul said that the kind of faith shown by Abraham's actions is the kind that God likes and counts as righteousness, but the keeping of traditions to gain a reward without having a relationship with God would not gain God's favor.
The other side of the discussion, which you seem to keep refusing to look at, is what happens if we fall out of God's favor because of unrighteousness.
Having gained God's favor through belief in His Son and repentance from the dead works of sin, can we stay in God's favor if we then choose to turn away from Him and return to the wickedness that Jesus brought us out of? God forbid.
God is longsuffering, and will maintain His favor for a while during times that we are unfaithful and sin against Him, because He is faithful.
But, if we continue doing the things that the children of disobedience did to earn God's wrath, then a time will come where God will not look upon us with favor any more.
Even though we are written in the book of life when we gain God's favor, we will be blotted out from the book of life if we lose God's favor. We will only gain the eternal life promised to us if our names are found written in the book of life at the end of our time on earth.