Well, I think we can at least agree on one thing: Warren was the anti-Barn.
And Helen Crump was the anti-Ellie/Peg. Wonder what causes last names like "Crump?"
Well, I think we can at least agree on one thing: Warren was the anti-Barn.
And Helen Crump was the anti-Ellie/Peg. Wonder what causes last names like "Crump?"
In the 70s, her name was Helen Crump-Schwump.
Sure He will. There will be people in the kingdom in flesh and blood bodies and at the end of the 1000 years Satan will deceive some of them and they will attack the saints. But then these rebels will be destroyed.
Due to Israel's unbelief the kingdom has been delayed until the Lord's return to the earth:
"And then shall they see the Son of man coming in a cloud with power and great glory. And when these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads; for your redemption draweth nigh. And he spake to them a parable; Behold the fig tree, and all the trees; When they now shoot forth, ye see and know of your own selves that summer is now nigh at hand. So likewise ye, when ye see these things come to pass, know ye that the kingdom of God is nigh at hand" (Lk.21:27-31).
According to your ideas the Lord did come in 70AD but what happened then had nothing to do with the kingdom
from the presence of the Lord Jesus (Acts 3:19-20).
That did not happen in the first century or anytime since.
Jerry,
Just to recap the flow of thought leading up to this last idea of yours.
The Lord Jesus' kingdom will be on the earth. That is why He had His disciples pray in the following way:
"And he said unto them, When ye pray, say, Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done, as in heaven, so in earth"
It is obvious that the Father's will has never been done on the earth as it is in heaven. Therefore, we can know that the Lord Jesus has not yet returned to the earth:
God's will, never having been done on earth?
So you think that the Lord's will is now being done on earth as it is in heaven?
That is foolish as the Apostle Paul describes the present age the following way:
"Who gave himself for our sins, that he might deliver us from this present evil age, according to the will of God and our Father" (Gal.1:4).
Do you really think that "evil" is a good description of the way that God's will is being done in heaven?
The kingdom will not start until the Lord Jesus returns to the earth:
"When the Son of man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory" (Mt.25:31).
"And then shall they see the Son of man coming in a cloud with power and great glory. And when these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads; for your redemption draweth nigh. And he spake to them a parable; Behold the fig tree, and all the trees; When they now shoot forth, ye see and know of your own selves that summer is now nigh at hand. So likewise ye, when ye see these things come to pass, know ye that the kingdom of God is nigh at hand" (Lk.21:27-31).
Of course these things have not yet happened. There is no evidence that the Lord Jesus began to reign in His kingdom when He sat on the throne of His glory at anytime in the past.
Or perhaps you want to argue that His reign is an evil one?
That is foolish as the Apostle Paul describes the present age the following way:
"Who gave himself for our sins, that he might deliver us from this present evil age, according to the will of God and our Father" (Gal.1:4).
Or perhaps you want to argue that His reign is an evil one?
Instead of discussing the last thing I said let us start with the first part because it lays the foundation of the rest. Let us start with my remarks here:
The Lord Jesus' kingdom will be on the earth. That is why He had His disciples pray in the following way:
"And he said unto them, When ye pray, say, Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done, as in heaven, so in earth"
It is obvious that the Father's will has never been done on the earth as it is in heaven. Therefore, we can know that the Lord Jesus has not yet returned to the earth:
"And then shall they see the Son of man coming in a cloud with power and great glory. And when these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads; for your redemption draweth nigh. And he spake to them a parable; Behold the fig tree, and all the trees; When they now shoot forth, ye see and know of your own selves that summer is now nigh at hand. So likewise ye, when ye see these things come to pass, know ye that the kingdom of God is nigh at hand" (Lk.21:27-31).
Could you please please give me your post number where you addressed Matthew 13?
Thanks!
The kingdom of heaven does not come with observation.
Galatians was written before 70AD
Therefore, Paul was describing the previous age when he said "this present evil age", not the present age we live in right now.
(Heb 9:26) ....But he has appeared once for all at the culmination of the ages to do away with sin by the sacrifice of himself.
What? Know ye not that the kingdom of God in within us, right here on earth today.
Do you really think that is what the Lord Jesus told the Pharisees?
That is ridiculous!
What He told them was that the kingdom was in their midst, in the sense that the King was right in front of them.
Later He said that "now" His kingdom was not of the world.
Jesus was telling the Pharisees that the kingdom of God is within us. At the time he told them that, the King was not residing there.
When Jesus said " the kingdom is not", again it was because God was not yet residing in us.
When the disciples received the Holy Ghost, then God begin residing in the temple that was made without hands. All believers, should be born again to allow God to reside in them, for that is his kingdom here on earth.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1Mind1Spirit
The kingdom of heaven does not come with observation.
Yes, it does not COME with observation but once it will arrive it will be seen.
Could Jesus have meant something entirely different?
Something like:
"The kingdom doesn't come with observation, but with participation." ??