HisServant
New member
Glad to hear you've corrected countless real theologians down the ages.
Countless? Its no surprise that they all say this after Darby taught his heresy...
Prior to Darby, no one used the excuse you are using.
Glad to hear you've corrected countless real theologians down the ages.
In order for someone to draw a conclusion, we need to read it.
Revelation 12:1-17 KJV
And there appeared a great wonder in heaven; a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars:
2 And she being with child cried, travailing in birth, and pained to be delivered.
3 And there appeared another wonder in heaven; and behold a great red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns, and seven crowns upon his heads.
4 And his tail drew the third part of the stars of heaven, and did cast them to the earth: and the dragon stood before the woman which was ready to be delivered, for to devour her child as soon as it was born.
5 And she brought forth a man child, who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron: and her child was caught up unto God, and to his throne.
6 And the woman fled into the wilderness, where she hath a place prepared of God, that they should feed her there a thousand two hundred and threescore days.
7 And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,
8 And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven.
9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.
10 And I heard a loud voice saying in heaven, Now is come salvation, and strength, and the kingdom of our God, and the power of his Christ: for the accuser of our brethren is cast down, which accused them before our God day and night.
11 And they overcame him by the blood of the Lamb, and by the word of their testimony; and they loved not their lives unto the death.
12 Therefore rejoice, ye heavens, and ye that dwell in them. Woe to the inhabiters of the earth and of the sea! for the devil is come down unto you, having great wrath, because he knoweth that he hath but a short time.
13 And when the dragon saw that he was cast unto the earth, he persecuted the woman which brought forth the man child.
14 And to the woman were given two wings of a great eagle, that she might fly into the wilderness, into her place, where she is nourished for a time, and times, and half a time, from the face of the serpent.
15 And the serpent cast out of his mouth water as a flood after the woman, that he might cause her to be carried away of the flood.
16 And the earth helped the woman, and the earth opened her mouth, and swallowed up the flood which the dragon cast out of his mouth.
17 And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.
The basics of the record parallel the record of the redeemer Jesus Christ and his mother, Mary.
The the child was born, Satan wanted him dead, they escaped.
Mary was persecuted as foretold by Simon the elderly man in the temple.
However, there is a likewise, figurative language there that presently would be difficult to pinpoint as to its meaning.
Third of the stars is the third of the angels that followed Lucifer, Satan, the Devil, the dragon, that old serpent, it is a past event
The book of Revelation being a vision that John participated in, like some OT books, the visions are difficult to ascertain as to their precise meaning.
Which is God's decision as to these matters.
We have plenty to do today. Matthew 6:34
And she brought forth a man child...
Interesting, since the Church is a she/her as the Bride and Christ the Bridegroom.
Countless? Its no surprise that they all say this after Darby taught his heresy...
Prior to Darby, no one used the excuse you are using.
And she brought forth a man child...
Interesting, since the Church is a she/her as the Bride and Christ the Bridegroom.
Well, you have a point?
BTW and FWIW, Rev 12 also speaks of a "remnant of her seed "who are left behind.
Darby did no differently than what you presently are doing. Wise up. Show where Darby was in error, if you think so?
A 1st century Jewish Christian would view the symbolism as obvious though. So you have to do your due diligence and study non-biblical text from the 1st century to look for like symbolism to determine its meaning.
And she brought forth a man child...
Interesting, since the Church is a she/her as the Bride and Christ the Bridegroom.
Indeed, nothing else fits the "woman" as being the visible church who who delivers those of the invisible Church, Body of Christ, to be caught away to meet Jesus in the air, to return with Him in that day when He sets His feet on Mt Zion..
BTW and FWIW, Rev 12 also speaks of a "remnant of her seed "who are left behind. Someone with courage should take the time to offer and opinion as who they believe that "remnant" is since they are so sure of everything else the have to say with nothing of substance to back it up.
There are countless pages and learned documents on the heresy that Darby and Scofield popularized... just open you eyes to the truth.
The Church originates in and follows from Christ, not vice-versa, therefore since the woman produces the manchild(Christ Jesus), the woman is genealogical Israel.
The remnant of her seed is the remnant of genealogical Israel and is supported substantially by the whole Bible.
I am still pondering the dream of Joseph and his family also.
Since mother, father, and brothers bowed down to Joseph, it was because he was a type of savior being the head man of pharaoh and saving the people from annihilation, by doling out bread.
This picture of a Messiah, applied to the woman clothed with the sun and the moon under her feet... would indicate the woman to be Mary and Jesus the man child as an alternate scenario. This time, shepherds (pastors of the flock) and wise men from the east (all nations- fulfilling promise to Abraham) are bowing before the male child.
I am thinking there are layered meanings, not just one. And it seems to me parts and pieces fit one and then another interpretation, weaving the OT and the NT salvation story into one history of God's plan.
Israel doesn't fit the mold. Stop reading your commentaries.
Israel is the only thing that fits the mold.
I read my Bible.
Try again. I know commentary opinion when I read/hear it.
So who is your mentor, Johnny Mac?
I leave you to your blind meanderings and fruitless speculations.
:carryon:
Israel is the only thing that fits the mold.
I read my Bible.
Yep.The Church originates in and follows from Christ, not vice-versa, therefore since the woman produces the manchild(Christ Jesus), the woman is genealogical Israel.
The remnant of her seed is the remnant of genealogical Israel and is supported substantially by the whole Bible.