SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
Oh sure, as if you didn't like "Truckin" when you used to hang out at Haight & Asbury!!!
ECT The Mystery: What and Why
- Thread starter Danoh
- Start date
Oh sure, as if you didn't like "Truckin" when you used to hang out at Haight & Asbury!!!
Mayor, Mayor, Mayor....No, I'm diggin' this type of musac:
View attachment 24570
Theys almost as good as "The Boys."
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
Those are some toe tappers, for certain.
:chuckle:
heir
TOL Subscriber
http://www.wayofthemaster.com/goodperson.shtml
The above is posted on a so called dispensational website as gospel! :vomit:
heir
TOL Subscriber
1 Timothy 1:3 KJV, 1 Timothy 4:16 KJV, 2 Timothy 4:2-5 KJV come to mind
I'll look at it; but the link title is already suspect :chuckle:
I got a blank website.
Besides; are they supposedly Mid-Acts?
Your stated beef as to MADS has been as to MADs you view as enemies in your belief they do not hold to 1 Cor. 15:1-4, in the way you do, and or that they supposedly add some type of work to believing.
If I am not mistaken - your other stated beef with MADs you view as enemies has been with MADs who do not hold to your understanding of Ephesians 2 as a different Mystery and or aspect of the Mystery than that preached by Paul in Acts.
Feel free to correct me on those two (as if you need permission :chuckle
musterion
Well-known member
Dear Sister, I used to follow Ray Comfort (somewhat...watched his man on the street videos and used some of his gimmicky tracts before learning what Lordship Salvation is), but I seriously do not think he's dispensational at all. Could be wrong on that, but I never picked up on it. He's pentecostal, which as you know usually precludes dispensationalism.
musterion
Well-known member
Not even remotely. At best, Acts 2 dispie in the John MacArthur vein (which is to say, little to not anymore) but open to "signs and wonders."
heir
TOL Subscriber
No, he's not a dispie. The link I shared is posted on a so called dispensational website as gospel. It is not, but a perverted gospel which is no good news at all.
heir
TOL Subscriber
http://www.wayofthemaster.com/goodperson.shtmlI'll look at it; but the link title is already suspect :chuckle:
I got a blank website.
Besides; are they supposedly Mid-Acts?
Your stated beef as to MADS has been as to MADs you view as enemies in your belief they do not hold to 1 Cor. 15:1-4, in the way you do, and or that they supposedly add some type of work to believing.
If I am not mistaken - your other stated beef with MADs you view as enemies has been with MADs who do not hold to your understanding of Ephesians 2 as a different Mystery and or aspect of the Mystery than that preached by Paul in Acts.
Feel free to correct me on those two (as if you need permission :chuckle
The above is posted on a so called dispensational website as gospel! Those who preach the cross as the power of God would not hold it up as gospel. It is a perverted gospel which is no good news at all.
Interplanner
Well-known member
How do you 'preach the cross as the power of God' but not uphold the Gospel?
When you add any kind of work on your part...
Galatians 3:1 O foolish Galatians, who hath bewitched you, that ye should not obey the truth, before whose eyes Jesus Christ hath been evidently set forth, crucified among you? 3:2 This only would I learn of you, Received ye the Spirit by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith? 3:3 Are ye so foolish? having begun in the Spirit, are ye now made perfect by the flesh?
Seems to me you are back pedaling.
The issue was over your two assertions against other MADs.
It was not about the Ray Comfort; Kirk Cameron psuedo dispy.
As Jordan has righly noted - anyone who begins the Body at Acts 2 is a Pentecostal whether they assert otherwise or not.
I would add they are 2,000 years too late.
Some of them do hold to a faith alone salvation, though.
I have known plenty of them on both sides of that.
But none of this was the issue.
You appear to be back peddling :chuckle:
Stand your ground til you believe otherwise.
Interplanner
Well-known member
Right, both were negatively done. I thought she was saying one was done right while the other wrong.
Thanks, bro.
John "Lordship Salvation" MacArthur is clue------less.
And, you already know where I stand on signs and wonders of any kind in this age :chuckle:
Come again?
1Mind1Spirit
Literal lunatic
You won't move one more step without embracing the spiritual.
Yer on the edge. :thumb:
No need to freak, I'm still here.
I see you're still lacing your thirty year old ganja with a shot of the Cuervo :chuckle: