geralduk,
I don't know why you refuse to understand the belief so many of us have explained to you regarding water baptism. I don't really care whether you accept the belief or not, but accept our explanation as to why we believe in the salvific value of water baptism, and stop misrepresenting our beliefs to be the substance of water saves and that the Holy Spirit is not necessary for our salvation. Neither of your assertions as such are true, and I believe you know that.
Our belief is:
1) Water baptism and 'Holy Spirit baptism are one and the same. We believe this based on scripture, particular the baptism of Our Lord.
"And when Jesus was baptized, He went up immediately from the water, and behold, the heavens were opened and He saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove, and alighting on him; and lo, a voice from heaven saying, 'This is my beloved Son, with whom I am well pleased"' (Mt. 3.16-17).
When Jesus gave us the example of baptism, the Holy Spirit descended on Jesus as he came out of the water. And St. Peter told the crowd at Pentecost:
"Peter said to them, 'Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins; and you shall receive the Holy Spirit" (Acts 2.38)
Again, it appears to us the gift of the Holy Spirit is given when we are baptized in water. We do not believe the substance of the water itself is going to save us, but by obedience to His command to be baptized and the sincere repentance from sin, we are given the gift of the Holy Spirit. That gift of the Holy Spirit is what effects our salvation, not the water itself.
St. Paul reflects this belief in his words to Titus:
"He saved us, not because of deeds done by us in righteousness, but in virtue of His own mercy, by the washing of regeneration and renewal in the Holy Spirit which He poured out upon us richly through Jesus Christ our Savior" (Titus 3.5)
So our baptism effects us by regeneration, in other words by washing away the evil effects of sin, and renewing our spirit with the gift of the Holy Spirit by which we are 'born again' as children of God.
2) We believe Jesus commanded baptism before entry into heave. Jesus told Nicodemus we must be baptized to enter the kingdom of heaven:
"Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God. That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit. Do not marvel that I said to you, 'You must be born anew."(John 3:5-7)
I know you don't believe Jesus was speaking about baptism here, but we do. And it seems strange to me to think he wasn't speaking of baptism, when right after this conversation with Nicodemus, Jesus and the apostles go into Judea and BAPTIZE:
"After this, Jesus and his disciples went in to the region of Judea, where he spent some time with them baptizing." (John 3:22)
It doesn't really make alot of sense for St. John to have written these words spoken by Jesus to Nicodemus and then follow up with words about baptism unless baptism was what St. John wanted to emphasize.
And of course you are familiar with the 'Great Commission' of the apostles, when Jesus commanded them to baptize. If baptism had no effect, why would Jesus command this? It just doesn't make sense.
3) The third reason why we believe water baptism is efficacious is the many examples of the apostles actions after Jesus ascended to heaven. Never do we see them praying for someone to be 'baptized in the Holy Spirit', but we see them frequently performing baptisms, many times explicitly in water, and never in some other form or fashion:
As they traveled along the road they came to some water, and the eunuch said, "Look, there is water. What is to prevent my being baptized?" Then he ordered the chariot to stop, and Philip and the eunuch both went down into the water, and he baptized him. (Acts 8.36-38)
"Can anyone withhold the water for baptizing these people, who have received the holy Spirit even as we have?" (Acts 10.47)
"20 who had once been disobedient while God patiently waited in the days of Noah during the building of the ark, in which a few persons, eight in all, were saved through water. 21 This prefigured baptism, which saves you now. It is not a removal of dirt from the body but an appeal to God for a clear conscience, through the resurrection of Jesus Christ," (1 Peter 3.20-21)
In the last example here, St. Peter very clearly says baptism SAVES. Your assertion directly contradicts St. Peter's words, words that are part of our divinely inspired Holy Scripture.
geralduk, I'm not reiterating my beliefs here for arguments sake. As I said before, I don't really care whether you accept my beliefs or not. I write these words again in an effort for you to see our true beliefs, that we RECEIVE THE HOLY SPIRIT THROUGH WATER BAPTISM.
Please stop the disingenuous practice of purporting we believe the substance of water saves us and that we don't ever speak of receiving the Holy Spirit, as if we believe the Holy Spirit is unnecessary. Again, we believe A PERSON RECEIVES THE HOLY SPIRIT IN WATER BAPTISM.
Furthermore, scripture tells us not of two baptisms, one by water and one by the Holy Spirit. Yes, the Holy Spirit can be received separate from baptism in many other ways. We don't deny this at all. But remember that St. Paul told us:
"There is one body and one Spirit, just as you were called in one hope of your calling; 5 one Lord, one faith, one baptism;" (Eph. 4.4-5)
I'll reiterate once more, I don't care if you accept my belief, but please stop misrepresenting my beliefs as 'water saves' or that the Holy Spirit is unnecessary for salvation.
God Bless,
Francisco