Oh man... if we could only get Dave to watch this video. :rotfl:
The ancient Greeks were divided on their cosmology and there is a reason that geocentric Aristotle won out over the heliocentric Pythagorean's.
Eclipses are not so easily explained as this video assumes. The causes of all eclipses are in dispute, always has been the case. I will go into this in my next post.
The Greeks based their cosmology on thought experiment, just as Einsteins relativity is. It's a presupposition that the earth is like the sun and the moon in that they are all spheres moving through space, and the stars are the same. You can say that they imagined it correctly because today we have confirmed it.
But it can be more realistically argued that the earth is not at all like the sun, moon, and stars for three important reasons.
1. The sun, moon, and stars do not have an atmosphere that can sustain life.
2. The sun, moon, and stars do not have bodies of water/oceans.
3. The sun, moon, and stars appear as lights in the sky.
Observation confirms the Genesis account. God did not make the the sun, moon, or stars to be inhabited. They were made to light the sky and to determine seasons and a calendar to track time on earth.
The geometry of the suns rays clearly shows a very close sun compared to the parallel rays that should come from a sun that is billions of miles away. The flat and straight horizon lines we see, the lack of motion we feel, and that water always seeks it's own level confirm a flat stationary earth that is contradicted by all kind's of "science", that is based on and originated from a false comparison and presumed eclipses that can be accounted for in other ways.
--Dave