:AMR: Why?
Did you do the same for Darwinism?
Luckily, you've been provided with evidence. You're supposed to focus on that and just ignore it when you're called a fruit loop.
Nope. People don't give up ideas when they are shown scientifically impossible.
We can't convince those who do not want to be convinced.
Nope.
You're utterly incorrect.
In science, ideas are discarded when they are shown impossible. However, you have shown that you are not following the scientific method. I described it in my previous post.
You think gravity is magic and appeal to God when asked about the physics of a flat Earth.
This means that what you believe is not scientific in nature: It's narrative, or religion, or indoctrination.
You're trying to speak like you appreciate the scientific method, but you've gotten it wrong again.
You should not be looking to falsify evidence; you should be looking to falsify your idea.
Evidence should be available to both sides. Ie, there is no such thing as "photographic evidence for flat Earth." There is only photographic evidence. It doesn't belong to one side or the other.
You could use the phrase to say that the evidence supports a flat Earth, but that's not what you were doing.
Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
And people will still believe in a globe even if it's shown how impossible it is.
I didn't appeal to God for a flat earth as opposed to physics. I appealed to God as the creator of the flat earth as opposed the evolution of the universe from the Big Bang--no God required for that.
Christians can't have the universe be God's creation and support a cosmology of an evolving universe started by a Big Bang without ending up with a mythologized Book of Genesis.
And yes, there is such a thing as photographic evidence for a flat earth.
--Dave